NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION d/b/a ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

April 17, 2012 Town of Alabama (Finger Lakes Region – Genesee County) – GGLDC – Western New York Science, Technology and Advanced Manufacturing Park Capital (Local Assistance Grant) – Adoption of Findings Pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act RESOLVED, that with respect to the Western New York Science, Technology and Advanced Manufacturing Park (“STAMP”) Project (the “Project”), the Corporation hereby makes and adopts pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) the following findings and determinations, which findings and determinations are made after full consideration of the Findings Statement attached as Exhibit A hereto, which Exhibit A is hereby adopted by the Corporation and copies of which document are hereby filed with the records of the Corporation: The Corporation has given consideration to the Draft and Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement (“DGEIS” and “FGEIS”, respectively) prepared for the proposed STAMP Project; The requirements of the SEQRA process, including the implementing regulations of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, have been met; Consistent with social, economic and other essential considerations from among the reasonable alternatives available, the Project is one that avoids or minimizes adverse environmental effects to the maximum extent practicable, including the effects disclosed in the FGEIS and the Findings Statement; Consistent with social, economic and other essential considerations, to the maximum extent practicable, adverse environmental effects revealed in the environmental impact statement process will be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable by incorporating as conditions to the decision those mitigation measures described in the FGEIS and the Findings Statement; The Project is in compliance with Section 14.09 of the State Historic Preservation Act; and The Project is in compliance with Section 305(4) of the Agriculture and Markets Law. and be it further RESOLVED, that the President and Chief Executive Officer or his designee(s) be, and each of them hereby is, authorized in the name and on behalf of the Corporation to take all actions as he or she may in his or her sole discretion consider to be necessary or proper to comply with the requirements of SEQRA in connection with the Project. * * *
EXHIBIT A <strong>STATE</strong> ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW FINDINGS <strong>STATE</strong>MENT Western New York Science & Technology Advanced Manufacturing Park New York State Urban Development Corporation d/b/a Empire State Development April 17, 2012 The New York State Urban Development Corporation, doing business as Empire State Development (“ESD”), as an involved agency in the environmental review conducted pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”), Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, and its implementing regulations (6 NYCRR Part 617), makes the following Findings based on the Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement (“FGEIS”) dated January 19, 2012 prepared by the lead agency, the Genesee County Economic Development Center (“GCEDC”), in connection with the proposed Western New York Science and Technology Advanced Manufacturing Park (“STAMP” or the “Project”) in the Town of Alabama, Genesee County, New York. Name of Action: Western New York Science &Technology Advanced Manufacturing Park Description of Action and Location: STAMP is proposed to be located on 1,243.40 acres of land in the Town of Alabama, County of Genesee, State of New York. The Project site is located along New York State Highway 77/63, approximately five miles north of the I-90/New York State Thruway in the Town of Alabama (the “Project Site”). The Project Site is bounded by Judge Road on the south; Lewiston Road on the north; NYS Highway 77/63 on the east; and Tonawanda Seneca Nation property on the west. ESD’s action involves the approval of funding to be used for a portion of the cost of land acquisition, design, engineering, infrastructure construction, and other soft costs to prepare and market the proposed STAMP Project. The Project Site is characterized by rural, agricultural land uses, predominant in the Town of Alabama. The Project Site borders the Hamlet of Alabama at its northeast corner. The Project Site is visually flat to gently rolling, and contains a variety of uplands and wetlands; the highest 1
Page 1 and 2:
NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CO
Page 3 and 4:
II. DISCRETIONARY PROJECTS - Contin
Page 5 and 6:
DRAFT - SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND REVIS
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
FOR CONSIDERATION April 17, 2012 TO
Page 35 and 36:
funds used to capitalize Innovate N
Page 37 and 38:
VI. Affirmative Action ESD’s Non-
Page 39 and 40:
Schedule A Innovate NY Fund- Summar
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Size: STREDC has a board consisting
Page 45 and 46:
c) a Third Disbursement of an amoun
Page 47 and 48:
April 17, 2012 Regional Council Awa
Page 49 and 50:
Rural Initiative Venture Fund South
Page 51 and 52:
Proposed Project: Establish a regio
Page 53 and 54:
Grantee Contact: Diane Lantz, Execu
Page 55 and 56:
9. ESD may reallocate the project f
Page 57 and 58:
RESOLVED, that the President and Ch
Page 59 and 60:
Proposed Project: Establish a regio
Page 61 and 62:
enhance the effectiveness of ESD’
Page 63 and 64:
8. Grantee will report quarterly on
Page 65 and 66:
April 17, 2012 Regional Council Awa
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Market: Real Estate and Industrial/
Page 71 and 72:
the Grantee for expenditures incurr
Page 73:
7 April 17, 2012 Chazy (North Count
Page 87 and 88:
Regional Council: The Central New Y
Page 89 and 90:
Project Team: Origination Ray Lawre
Page 91 and 92: is less than eighty-five percent 85
Page 93 and 94: V. Environmental Review ESD staff h
Page 95 and 96: State Division of the Budget; and b
Page 97 and 98: Huhtamaki MAP Capital Fulton Oswego
Page 99 and 100: Employment: Initial employment at t
Page 101 and 102: 300,000 packed boxes to 700,000 pac
Page 103 and 104: (iv) 40% of the disbursed amount if
Page 105 and 106: VI. Affirmative Action ESD’s Non-
Page 107 and 108: RESOLVED, that the President and Ch
Page 109 and 110: Project Summary Benefit-Cost Evalua
Page 111 and 112: FOR CONSIDERATION April 17, 2012 TO
Page 113 and 114: 2. Each proposed project would be u
Page 115 and 116: RESOLVED, that the President and Ch
Page 117 and 118: A. Precisionmatics Capital (X328) A
Page 119 and 120: A. Precisionmatics Capital (X328) A
Page 121 and 122: Baseline Employment A. Precisionmat
Page 123 and 124: B. D4 Capital (X249) April 17, 2012
Page 129 and 130: Strategic Investment Program (Senat
Page 131 and 132: April 17, 2012 Local Assistance - F
Page 133 and 134: April 17, 2012 Strategic Investment
Page 135 and 136: A. GGLDC - Western New York Science
Page 137 and 138: GGLDC - Western New York Science, T
Page 139 and 140: GGLDC - Western New York Science, T
Page 141: GGLDC - Western New York Science, T
Page 145 and 146: e-orienting proposed development ar
Page 147 and 148: approximately 24,000 linear feet of
Page 149 and 150: In addition to the site selection c
Page 151 and 152: natural gas, electricity, or broadb
Page 153 and 154: The Project will require additional
Page 155 and 156: Findings While it is impossible to
Page 157 and 158: Work within streams and other water
Page 159 and 160: consideration the data provided wit
Page 161 and 162: Project Site will be set aside as c
Page 163 and 164: Air pollution control systems inclu
Page 165 and 166: Intersection turning movement traff
Page 167 and 168: threshold is reached or when the Pr
Page 169 and 170: e limited to smaller buildings whic
Page 171 and 172: In addition to the required alterna
Page 173 and 174: . Implementation of the recommendat
Page 175 and 176: Potential for increase in motor veh
Page 177 and 178: year old age range from the Genesee
Page 179 and 180: Agricultural Resources Discussion o
Page 181 and 182: cumulative impacts are impacts on t
Page 183 and 184: Ancillary/Secondary Growth The Proj
Page 185 and 186: epresents less than 1% of the total
Page 187 and 188: utilization of renewable energy res
Page 189 and 190: CERTIFICATION OF FINDINGS Having co
Page 191 and 192: B. Town of Islip - Drainage Improve
Page 193 and 194:
Financial Terms and Conditions: Tow
Page 197 and 198:
FOR INFORMATION April 17, 2012 TO:
Page 199 and 200:
CO. VENDOR NAME ORIG CONT DATE REAS
show all

NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION d/b/a ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?