14.06.2013 Views

E. H. ADDINGTON

E. H. ADDINGTON

E. H. ADDINGTON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 APPENDIX—REPORT OP COMMITTEE<br />

to receive in a particular Lodge. Whether that is a wise provision<br />

that necessitates this is apart from our consideration. It is a situation<br />

that we face.<br />

Brother Smith says that Hacquet, who was the head of the Accepted<br />

Eite of France, refused to recognize the A. and A. Eite as identical<br />

with his. We do not deny it. We admit it to this extent—that<br />

the latter had eight degrees in its system that the former had not. But<br />

while Hacquet may have done as Brother Smith says he did, yet his<br />

Body accepted it 'at a subsequent time, and the Supreme Council of<br />

France and the Supreme Council of the Southern States of America came<br />

to do the same work, and extended mutual recognition. All that can<br />

be said is that it was recognized that Hacquet had made a mistake and<br />

that mistake was rectified.<br />

We have had similar experience in the York Eite. American Masons<br />

received certain degrees in the Capitular Department of that Bite; concocted<br />

another degree and reorganized the Department. Any Grand<br />

Principal of England can say that the American Capitular Masonry is<br />

not identical with the Mark Masonry and the Capitular Masonry of<br />

England. And it would not be denied by anybody that knew the facts.<br />

But Capitular Masonry in the United States did not cease to be Masonic<br />

because of the working in it of the Most Excellent Master's Degree,<br />

and mutual recognition exists between the English and the American<br />

members of that Department of the Fraternity.<br />

The Grand Lodge of England, the Mother Grand Lodge of the World,<br />

we take it knows pretty well what true Freemasonry is. We wish indeed<br />

that Brother Smith would take her word for it, and come to understand<br />

that the A. and A. Eite is quite as legitimate as the York Eite.<br />

Brother Smith tells us that what he calls the twenty-five degree<br />

system, that is the Modern Eite, did not claim the authority to establish<br />

Craft Lodges, and that the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Eite did<br />

not claim it, or at least did not exercise it until 1818. Brother Smith,<br />

listen to the facts of history. On the 27th December, 1798, Etoile<br />

Polaire Lodge was established in New Orleans under the French Eite.<br />

This Lodge exists now under the Grand Lodge of Louisiana. The authority<br />

for the charter was the Provincial Lodge of Marseilles, the Grand<br />

Orient of France being suspended owing to political troubles. But the<br />

latter resumed labor in 1803, and among its first acts was sending of<br />

a charter to the New Orleans Lodge. This in ratification of aforementioned<br />

act of the Provincial Grand Lodge of Marseilles.<br />

In 1806 there was moved to New Orleans Lodge la Eeunion Desiree,<br />

which had received a charter from the Grand Orient of France, April<br />

16, 1783, for Port au Prince, San Domingo. A duplicate charter authorizing<br />

and ratifying the transfer of domicile to New Orleans was granted<br />

March 3, 1807. This Lodge was also registered in the General Grand<br />

Chapter of the Modern Eite, March 4, 1807, which signified that a Chapter<br />

of Eose Croix was attached to it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!