19.06.2013 Views

United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian Institution

United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian Institution

United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian Institution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

^64 GLOS80PHAGA MONOPHYLLUS.<br />

Glossophaga mutica Merriam. Biological Survo}^ collection.<br />

Proc. Biol. Soc. AVash., XII, pp. 18-19, January 27, 1898.<br />

89271. Skin and skull. Adult male. Maria Madre Island, Ties<br />

Marias Islands, Mexico. Ma}- 8, 18t>7. Collected by E. W.<br />

Nelson and E. A. Goldman. Original number 10970.<br />

AVcll-made skin in good condition; skull perfect.<br />

Glossophaga villosa II. Allen.<br />

Proc. U. S. Nat. Mu?., XVIII No. 1100, p. 779, October 27, 1896. Preoccupied<br />

by ''r7o.'*.sy/)/«(yar///nx« Rengger, Naturgesch, Siiugeth. Paraguay, p. 80, 1830.<br />

^Glossophaga truei II. Allen, Science, new ser., V, p. 153, January 22, 1897.<br />

stWs- Skin in alcohol, and skull. The specimen has no original<br />

label, and bears onl\' a small tag numl)ered 9523, which corresponds<br />

in the catalogue to a small bat, '' ] 'e.spert /'lio,^' nmrked in the origi-<br />

nal catalogue as coming from "(Guyana, Venezuela." No other<br />

data are given. It was catalogued some time between February 12,<br />

and March 17, 1S70; skull, April 21, 1898. Dr. II. Allen, in his<br />

description of Glossophaga villosa^ saj^s that the localitj'^ is probabl}^<br />

La (hiayra, Venezuela. This mistake was probably made by his<br />

referring to the copied v'olume of the original catalogue, where<br />

the locality is given as "Guyara, Venezuela," which might be taken<br />

to mean La Guayra; but in the original catalogue itself the writ-<br />

ing is quite plainly "Guyana, Venezuela.'' Whether the localitv<br />

in the catalogue is meant to be the eastern end of Venezuela bor-<br />

dering on Guiana or in the old spelling, Guyana, or whether it<br />

means that the specimen came from the general region of N'enezuela<br />

and Guiana, it is impos<strong>si</strong>ble to say. A second specimen which<br />

Dr. II. Allen had, No, 952-4, has no data whatever, and it may or<br />

may not have come from the same locality.<br />

Skin in alcohol in good condition, skull with left ]>()sterior basal portidii and<br />

zygoma broken away. The type i.'^ de<strong>si</strong>gnated by number, "9522," an error<br />

for 9523.<br />

Genus MONOPHYLLUS.<br />

Monophyllus clinedaphus Miller.<br />

Proc. Wa.-h. Acad. Sci., II, p. 3(), March ;!0, 1900.<br />

AVo^s- In alcohol (skull removed). Adult male. Specimen with no<br />

history. Alcoholic catalogued October 30, 18(!1; skull :May 2, 1898.<br />

Alcoholic in good condition; .skull with right zygoma mis<strong>si</strong>ng and right con-<br />

dyloid process of mandible broken.<br />

Monophyllus cubanus Miller.<br />

Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. I'hila., 1902, p. 410, September 12, 1902.<br />

113674. Skin and skull. Adult male. Baracoa, eastern Cuba, West<br />

Indies. February 6, 1902. Collected by William Palmer. Original<br />

number 645. Catalogued April 17, liH)2.<br />

Well-made skin in good lundition; skull perfect, except slight break in left<br />

zygoma.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!