United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian Institution
United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian Institution
United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian Institution
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
^64 GLOS80PHAGA MONOPHYLLUS.<br />
Glossophaga mutica Merriam. Biological Survo}^ collection.<br />
Proc. Biol. Soc. AVash., XII, pp. 18-19, January 27, 1898.<br />
89271. Skin and skull. Adult male. Maria Madre Island, Ties<br />
Marias Islands, Mexico. Ma}- 8, 18t>7. Collected by E. W.<br />
Nelson and E. A. Goldman. Original number 10970.<br />
AVcll-made skin in good condition; skull perfect.<br />
Glossophaga villosa II. Allen.<br />
Proc. U. S. Nat. Mu?., XVIII No. 1100, p. 779, October 27, 1896. Preoccupied<br />
by ''r7o.'*.sy/)/«(yar///nx« Rengger, Naturgesch, Siiugeth. Paraguay, p. 80, 1830.<br />
^Glossophaga truei II. Allen, Science, new ser., V, p. 153, January 22, 1897.<br />
stWs- Skin in alcohol, and skull. The specimen has no original<br />
label, and bears onl\' a small tag numl)ered 9523, which corresponds<br />
in the catalogue to a small bat, '' ] 'e.spert /'lio,^' nmrked in the origi-<br />
nal catalogue as coming from "(Guyana, Venezuela." No other<br />
data are given. It was catalogued some time between February 12,<br />
and March 17, 1S70; skull, April 21, 1898. Dr. II. Allen, in his<br />
description of Glossophaga villosa^ saj^s that the localitj'^ is probabl}^<br />
La (hiayra, Venezuela. This mistake was probably made by his<br />
referring to the copied v'olume of the original catalogue, where<br />
the locality is given as "Guyara, Venezuela," which might be taken<br />
to mean La Guayra; but in the original catalogue itself the writ-<br />
ing is quite plainly "Guyana, Venezuela.'' Whether the localitv<br />
in the catalogue is meant to be the eastern end of Venezuela bor-<br />
dering on Guiana or in the old spelling, Guyana, or whether it<br />
means that the specimen came from the general region of N'enezuela<br />
and Guiana, it is impos<strong>si</strong>ble to say. A second specimen which<br />
Dr. II. Allen had, No, 952-4, has no data whatever, and it may or<br />
may not have come from the same locality.<br />
Skin in alcohol in good condition, skull with left ]>()sterior basal portidii and<br />
zygoma broken away. The type i.'^ de<strong>si</strong>gnated by number, "9522," an error<br />
for 9523.<br />
Genus MONOPHYLLUS.<br />
Monophyllus clinedaphus Miller.<br />
Proc. Wa.-h. Acad. Sci., II, p. 3(), March ;!0, 1900.<br />
AVo^s- In alcohol (skull removed). Adult male. Specimen with no<br />
history. Alcoholic catalogued October 30, 18(!1; skull :May 2, 1898.<br />
Alcoholic in good condition; .skull with right zygoma mis<strong>si</strong>ng and right con-<br />
dyloid process of mandible broken.<br />
Monophyllus cubanus Miller.<br />
Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. I'hila., 1902, p. 410, September 12, 1902.<br />
113674. Skin and skull. Adult male. Baracoa, eastern Cuba, West<br />
Indies. February 6, 1902. Collected by William Palmer. Original<br />
number 645. Catalogued April 17, liH)2.<br />
Well-made skin in good lundition; skull perfect, except slight break in left<br />
zygoma.