The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive
The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive
The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Stalin</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Falsification<br />
please about the horrors <strong>of</strong> the dictatorship <strong>of</strong> the proletariat. Now, if we were to place the members <strong>of</strong><br />
the Vikzhel under arrest-I could understand that. Let them howl about the arrests. <strong>The</strong> delegates from<br />
Tver [<strong>The</strong> peasant delegate from Tver demanded at the Congress <strong>of</strong> the Soviets on October 25 (November 7) the arrest <strong>of</strong><br />
Avksentiev and other conciliationist leaders <strong>of</strong> the then Peasant Alliance .-- L. T.] said at the Congress <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Soviets, "Arrest them all"-here is something I can understand. Here you have a man who understands the<br />
dictatorship <strong>of</strong> the proletariat. Our present slogan is: No compromise, i.e., for a homogeneous Bolshevik<br />
Government.<br />
LUNACHARSKY: I should like to share with you my impressions <strong>of</strong> the masses who have done the<br />
fighting. I was very much astonished to hear Vladimir Ilyich say in his speech that Kamenev supposedly<br />
fails to recognize the revolution as a socialist revolution. But who holds power now? <strong>The</strong> Bolsheviks.<br />
That fact alone speaks for itself. I am unaware that Kamenev holds a Menshevik point <strong>of</strong> view. Our<br />
influence is growing. <strong>The</strong> peasants are coming over to our side.<br />
<strong>The</strong> city worker, too, is beginning to understand that the question <strong>of</strong> land is not a matter <strong>of</strong> indifference<br />
to him. We have adopted the S. R. resolution as the basis for the land decree. We have introduced it into<br />
the program <strong>of</strong> our activities, we can likewise introduce it in appointing the government. [Lunacharsky<br />
develops the following idea in his argument: Since the Bolsheviks have included in their land decree a peasant measure<br />
permeated with the S.R. spirit, therefore, the Bolsheviks must also share the state power with the Social Revolutionists.-L.<br />
T.] We [the Right Wing Oppositionist that a homogeneous socialist government is necessary. We say:<br />
Not a single place to the Constitutional-Democrats [the Cadets].[44]<br />
We have, furthermore, pointed out the necessity <strong>of</strong> workers' control, the necessity <strong>of</strong> regulating<br />
production by the factory and shop committees. <strong>The</strong> other parties are agreed on this. We will compel<br />
everybody to accept this point. This plus the Soviet power exhausts our program. Does this imply that we<br />
reject City Dumas? Why, it is our own people who are seated in them. If these Dumas attempt to seize<br />
[power], we will crush them. But does it mean that we aim to give the Dumas a little slice <strong>of</strong> power? No.<br />
[We mean to give them] simply representation [in the Soviet Government]. Is it really possible that we<br />
would continue the civil war over this issue? No, we can't do it. Having re-elections for the Dumas-that is<br />
another matter. Here we are already eight days in power, but we still do not know whether the peace<br />
decree has been made known to the people. . . . Who is responsible for it? <strong>The</strong> technical personnel which<br />
is bourgeois or petty bourgeois. <strong>The</strong>y sabotage us. If the City Duma were to demand a change in the<br />
main political line -- that would be another matter. But if they demand only representation in the<br />
government, then there is no need even to discuss it. We cannot manage with our own forces. Famine<br />
will break out. If we do not have with us those who are sabotaging, i.e., the technical apparatus, then<br />
even our agitation will not he read abroad, and we will not be able to manage anything. Of course, we<br />
can resort to terror-- but why? Where is the need for it?<br />
We will strive for conciliation. But should they try to hold our hands, we are sufficiently resolute people<br />
to give them the proper answer. . . . At the present moment we must above all take possession <strong>of</strong> the<br />
entire apparatus. This implies acting along the line <strong>of</strong> least resistance, and not taking each post by a<br />
bayonet charge. Otherwise we won't achieve anything. That is the first stage. We must conquer the first<br />
rung on the ladder in order to climb the next one. It is impermissible to make leaps, we must proceed<br />
gradually by stages. [We have here, from the lips <strong>of</strong> Lunacharsky, the formula which provides the leitmotif for the<br />
entire activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Stalin</strong>. In defending for Germany (in l923) the self-same policy <strong>of</strong> conciliationism and temporization that<br />
Lunacharsky defended in 1917, <strong>Stalin</strong> kept invariably repeating: "It is impermissible to make leaps, we must proceed<br />
gradually step by step." -- L. T.] We must consolidate our position as quickly as possible. We must put the<br />
entire state apparatus in order, and then proceed. Whoever pulls a string too tightly will end by breaking<br />
http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1937-st2/sf08.htm (6 <strong>of</strong> 13) [06/06/2002 15:06:45]