24.06.2013 Views

The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive

The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive

The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Stalin</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Falsification -- Chapter 9<br />

from the latter in his insistence upon a more precise formulation <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> the future revolution,<br />

arguing that the proletariat once having come to power, in alliance with the rural masses, would be<br />

unable to halt at the "democratic" stage and would have to continue to the "socialist stage," i.e., would<br />

make the revolution permanent. [BACK TO TEXT]<br />

56. In defending his (that is, Trotsky's) amendment, Krassin said at the third congress <strong>of</strong> the Bolsheviks:<br />

"As regards the resolu tion <strong>of</strong> Comrade Lenin, I see its weak point in its failure to stress the question <strong>of</strong><br />

the provisional government, and to indicate with sufficient clarity the connection between provisional<br />

government and armed uprising. As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, the provisional gov ernment is established by the<br />

popular uprising as its own organ.<br />

I further find in the resolution the incorrect opinion that the provisional revolutionary government will<br />

appear only after the final victory <strong>of</strong> the armed uprising and after the overthrow <strong>of</strong> autocracy. No-it arises<br />

in the very process <strong>of</strong> the uprising and takes the most active part in the conduct <strong>of</strong> the uprising, insuring<br />

the latter's victory by its organized action. It is naive to think that the social democracy will be able to<br />

take part in the provi sional revolutionary government the moment the autocracy is completely<br />

overthrown; when the chestnuts have been removed from the fire by other hands than ours, nobody will<br />

ever dream <strong>of</strong> sharing them with us." In dealing with Krassin's remarks, Lenin said: "Taking it by and<br />

large, I subscribe to the opinion <strong>of</strong> Comrade Krassin. It is natural that as a literary man, I should<br />

concentrate my attention on the literary shaping <strong>of</strong> the question. <strong>The</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> the object <strong>of</strong> the<br />

struggle is pointed out by Comrade Krassin very exactly, and I wholly subscribe to his view. One cannot<br />

engage in a struggle without expecting to cap ture the position for which one is fighting." Commenting<br />

on the episode twenty-four years later, Trotsky wrote: "<strong>The</strong> resolution was correspondingly amended. It<br />

may not be superfluous to remark that during the polemics <strong>of</strong> the last few years, the reso lution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Third Congress on the question <strong>of</strong> provisional gov ernment has been quoted hun~reds <strong>of</strong> times as<br />

something opposed to 'Trotskyism.' <strong>The</strong> 'Red Pr<strong>of</strong>essors' <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Stalin</strong> <strong>school</strong> have not the ghost <strong>of</strong> an<br />

idea that they are quoting against me, as an example <strong>of</strong> Leninism, the very lines that I wrote myself." (My<br />

Life, New York, 1930, p. 173.) [BACK TO TEXT]<br />

57. In reply to an article in the bourgeois liberal journal, Nasha Zhizn [Our Life], which sought to<br />

contrast the "reasonable" views <strong>of</strong> Lenin to the "permanent revolution" <strong>of</strong> Trotsky, the Bolshevik organ,<br />

Novaya Zhizn [New Life] replied, on Novem ber 27, 1905: "This gratuitous report is <strong>of</strong> course slicer<br />

nonsense. Comrade Trotsky said that the proletarian revolution, without standing still at the first stage, by<br />

pressing hard upon the ex ploiters, can continue on its road, while Lenin pointed out that the political<br />

revolution is only the first step. <strong>The</strong> publicist <strong>of</strong> Nasha Zhizn would like to perceive a contradiction there.<br />

.<br />

<strong>The</strong> whole misunderstanding comes, first, from the fear with which the name alone <strong>of</strong> the social<br />

revolution fills Nasha Zhizn, secondiy, out <strong>of</strong> the desire <strong>of</strong> this paper to discover some sort <strong>of</strong> sharp and<br />

piquant difference <strong>of</strong> opinion among the social demo crats and, thirdly, in the metaphorical expression <strong>of</strong><br />

Comrade Trotsky: 'at one fell swoop.' In No. 10 <strong>of</strong> Nachalo [<strong>The</strong> Beginning], Comrade Trotsky explains<br />

his ideas quite unequivocally:<br />

'<strong>The</strong> complete victory <strong>of</strong> the revolution signifies the victory <strong>of</strong> the proletariat,' writes Comrade Trotsky.<br />

'But this victory in turn signifies the further uninterruptedness <strong>of</strong> the revolution. <strong>The</strong> proletariat realizes<br />

the fundamental tasks <strong>of</strong> democracy and the logic <strong>of</strong> its immediate struggle for the safeguarding <strong>of</strong> politi<br />

cal domination causes purely socialist problems to arise at the given moment. Between the minimum and<br />

http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1937-st2/sf09.htm (20 <strong>of</strong> 21) [06/06/2002 15:07:02]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!