The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive
The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive
The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Stalin</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Falsification<br />
it. It will burst. <strong>The</strong> party representative in the Navy Committee said just now that the majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sailors are in such a mood that they are ready to go to Smolny[45] and announce that they refuse to wage<br />
a civil war over the question whether the Bolsheviks should have more power or less. This emergency<br />
situation cannot long continue. To prolong it is to bleed to death, without the support <strong>of</strong> the technical<br />
apparatus.<br />
I was amazed to hear Vladimir Ilyich's remark about negotiating with General Kaledin, [Lenin, as is evident<br />
from the context, said that if we are to enter into negotiations in order to liquidate the evil war, then we ought to negotiate<br />
with Kaledin and not with the Mensheviks. <strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial editors <strong>of</strong> the Istpart, as their explanatory remarks show,<br />
completely missed the meaning <strong>of</strong> this purely Leninist argument. -- L. T.] because, you know, the latter represents a<br />
real force, whereas the Mensheviks represent a mythical one. But this mythical force is capable <strong>of</strong><br />
moving troops from the front and <strong>of</strong> provoking battle near Vinnitsa, and <strong>of</strong> preventing the Latvian<br />
riflemen from arriving here. We are automatically prevented from achieving anything on the position we<br />
have assumed. We have become very fond <strong>of</strong> war, as if we were not a workers' party hut a party <strong>of</strong> the<br />
soldiery, a party <strong>of</strong> war. It is necessary to create, but we are doing nothing. We continue to polemicize in<br />
the party, and we'll keep on polemicizing, until only one man remains-a dictator. [<strong>The</strong>se words were greeted<br />
by applause (there is further reference to this in Trotsky's speech). <strong>The</strong> fact is that during tile negotiations for a coalition<br />
government composed <strong>of</strong> all Soviet parties, the Conciliationists put forward the demand to "conclude" the civil war, and,<br />
in order to attain this, to eliminate Lenin and Trotsky from the government. Sometimes, Lenin alone was mentioned. <strong>The</strong><br />
Rights were willing to accept this .-L. T.]<br />
We cannot possibly handle the situation by means <strong>of</strong> arrests. It is impossible to attack the technical<br />
apparatus, it is too big. <strong>The</strong> people are reasoning as follows: Our program must be fulfilled, provided the<br />
arms remain in the hands <strong>of</strong> the workers. We can get a breathing spell on this basis. But we cannot set to<br />
work now, because there is no apparatus. Such a condition cannot long continue. We must show that we<br />
are capable <strong>of</strong> constructive work, instead <strong>of</strong> saying only: "Keep on fighting! Keep on fighting!" To clear<br />
our path with bayonets-that will get us nowhere. It is much easier to compel people who are working<br />
badly to do their work better, than to coerce a man to work by force. In the face <strong>of</strong> all these difficulties I<br />
consider conciliation desirable. None <strong>of</strong> your arguments relating to the Mensheviks will convince the<br />
masses. I am firmly convinced that it is impermissible to work as we are now working. It is<br />
impermissible from the standpoint <strong>of</strong> principle, and, moreover, it is impermissible to risk innumerable<br />
lives. Do not sow dissension. <strong>The</strong>re is enough dissension as it is, and the masses are becoming very<br />
restive.<br />
TROTSKY: We are told that we are incapable <strong>of</strong> building up. In that case we should simply surrender<br />
power to those who were correct in struggling against us. But we have al- ready performed a great labor.<br />
We are told that we cannot sit on bayonets. But neither can we manage without bayonets. We need<br />
bayonets there in order to be able to sit here. One should imagine that the experience we have already<br />
gone through has taught us something. <strong>The</strong>re has been a battle in Moscow. Yes, there was a serious battle<br />
with the Junkers[46] there. But these Junkers owe allegiance neither to the Mensheviks nor the Vikzhel.<br />
Conciliation with the Vikzhel will not do away with the conflict with the Junker detachments <strong>of</strong> the<br />
bourgeoisie. No. A cruel class struggle will continue to be waged against us in the future as well. When<br />
all these middle-class lice, who are now incapable <strong>of</strong> taking either side, discover that our Government is<br />
a strong one, they will come to our side, together with the Vikzhel. Owing to the fact that we crushed the<br />
Cossacks <strong>of</strong> [General] Krasnov beneath Petersburg, we were showered on the very next day with<br />
telegrams <strong>of</strong> congratulation. <strong>The</strong> petty bourgeois masses are seeking that force to which they must submit<br />
themselves. Whoever fails to understand this, cannot have the slightest comprehension <strong>of</strong> anything in the<br />
http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1937-st2/sf08.htm (7 <strong>of</strong> 13) [06/06/2002 15:06:45]