24.06.2013 Views

The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive

The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive

The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Stalin</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Falsification - Chapter 13<br />

the Southern Front, as the decisive front. This document alone crumbles to dust the Voroshilov<br />

construction. But one could adduce scores <strong>of</strong> other pro<strong>of</strong>s that Trotsky spent most <strong>of</strong> his time at the<br />

Southern Front. For example, one need only examine the orders <strong>of</strong> Trotsky to the Red Army for the year<br />

1919 in order to become convinced that the overwhelming majority <strong>of</strong> them not only apply to the<br />

Southern Front but were issued at the very front itself (in connection with another question we shall later<br />

deal more fully with this). In particular, the entire decisive preparatory stage which pre ceded the<br />

advance against Denikin was spent by Trotsky at the Southern Front, with the exception <strong>of</strong> October and<br />

the beginning <strong>of</strong> November when he directed the defense <strong>of</strong> Petrograd.<br />

It seems to us that we have dealt amp!y with this question above. But what sloppiness and what<br />

disrespect for the party are needed in order to put in circulation the Voroshilov twaddle!<br />

<strong>The</strong> second"general" <strong>falsification</strong>. This time we have apparent!y an independent (and, indeed, for the<br />

first time expressed) invention <strong>of</strong> the "refresher" himself. We have in mind the question <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

strategic plans for the Southern Front. In accordance with the plan <strong>of</strong> the Chief Command the decisive<br />

blow was to have been dealt to Denikin from the Balashov-Kamishin Front at Nizhni Don. This plan was<br />

based on the idea <strong>of</strong> annihilating Denikin's Cossack base, even at the cost <strong>of</strong> our own retreat in the<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> Moscow. Trotsky from the very beginning (July 1919) considered this plan erroneous and<br />

fought against its confirmation by the Central Committee. He considered that this plan would only assist<br />

in uniting two absolutely heterogeneous social formations, i. e., the Cossacks with the volunteer army.<br />

On the contrary, by dealing a blow a!ong the line Voronezh-Kharkov-Donbass, the Red Army would<br />

move in a socially friendly milieu (the Kharkov and Donetz proletariat and peasantry), the Cos sacks<br />

would be cut <strong>of</strong>f from Denikin, on whom would fall the entire force <strong>of</strong> the blow. Nevertheless, the plan<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Chief Command was accepted, with the direct assistance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Stalin</strong> and against the sharp opposition<br />

<strong>of</strong> Trotsky. (<strong>The</strong> episode <strong>of</strong> Trotsky's handing in his resignation is intimate!y linked up with the question<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Southern strategic plan.) <strong>The</strong>re followed serious failures at the front (all this can be easily checked<br />

up chronologically). Trotsky characterized the situation in September 1919 (and not ten years later as<br />

Voroshi lov is doing) in his letter to the Central Committee <strong>of</strong> the party as follows:<br />

"<strong>The</strong> plan <strong>of</strong> operations on the Southern Front which was worked out a priori has proved false to the<br />

core. <strong>The</strong> failures at the Southern Front are to be explained first and foremost by the falseness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

basic plan. . . . <strong>The</strong>refore the reasons for the failures must be sought entirely in the plan <strong>of</strong> operations."<br />

And Trotsky goes on to explain how and why this erroneous plan came to originate:<br />

"<strong>The</strong> erroneousness <strong>of</strong> this plan is now so self-evident, that the question arises: How could it have<br />

originated at all? Its origin is to be explained historically. When Kolchak threat ened the Volga the chief<br />

threat was in the junction between Denikin and Kolchak. In a letter to Kolchak, Denikin set Saratov as<br />

the nieeting place. Hence the task as proposed even by the old command was the creation <strong>of</strong> a powerful<br />

wedge in the Tsaritsin-Saratov area. . . ." (How the Revolution Armed Itself, Vol.2, Bk. 1, pp. 300f. This<br />

document was published more than six years ago. Voroshilov, it is obvious, counts -- not without some<br />

justification -- on the fact that all <strong>of</strong> Trotsky's books had been removed from circulation.)<br />

Shortly prior to the writing <strong>of</strong> this document, comrade Trotsky had succeeded at the front in convincing<br />

Lashevich and Serebriakov <strong>of</strong> the correctness <strong>of</strong> his plan. <strong>The</strong> result <strong>of</strong> this agreement was their joint<br />

code telegram which we quote in full:<br />

"Moscow. To the Chief Command; copy to the C.C.<br />

http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1937-st2/sf13.htm (10 <strong>of</strong> 14) [06/06/2002 15:07:18]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!