The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive
The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive
The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Stalin</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Falsification -- Chapter 10<br />
difficult conditions to clutch at rotten ropes.<br />
Next to the revolution the greatest historical test is war. We say beforehand: <strong>The</strong>re will be no room<br />
during the events <strong>of</strong> war for the <strong>Stalin</strong>ist and Bukharinist policy <strong>of</strong> zigzags, side-stepping and subterfuges<br />
-- the policy <strong>of</strong> Centrism. This applies to the entire leadership <strong>of</strong> the Comintern. Today, the only test put<br />
to the leaders <strong>of</strong> the foreign communist parties is the question: Are you ready to vote night and day<br />
against "Trotskyism"? But war will confront them with far weightier demands. Meanwhile, the policy<br />
with respect to the Kuomintang and the Anglo-Russian Committee has obviously made them turn their<br />
eyes towards the Amsterdam and social-democratic tops. No matter how you squirm-the line <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Anglo-Russian Committee was the line <strong>of</strong> relying upon the rotten rope <strong>of</strong> the Amsterdam bureaucracy,<br />
whose worst section at the present time is the General Council. In the event <strong>of</strong> war you will have to<br />
stumble time and again over "surprises." <strong>The</strong> rotten ropes will fall apart in your hands. War will cause a<br />
sharp differentiation among the present tops <strong>of</strong> the Comintern. A certain section will go over to the<br />
Amsterdam position under the slogan: "We want to defend the U.S.S.R. seriously -- we do not wish to be<br />
a handful <strong>of</strong> fanatics." Another section <strong>of</strong> the European communists-we firmly believe they will be in the<br />
majority -- will stand on the position <strong>of</strong> Lenin, on the position <strong>of</strong> Liebknecht that we are defending.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re will be no room for the intermediate position <strong>of</strong> <strong>Stalin</strong>. That is why, permit me to say this frankly,<br />
all this talk <strong>of</strong> a handful <strong>of</strong> Oppositionists, <strong>of</strong> generals with out an army, and so forth and so on, seem<br />
utterly ludicrous to us. <strong>The</strong> Bolsheviks have heard all this more than once both in 1914 and in 1917. We<br />
foresee tomorrow all too clearly, and we are preparing for it. Never before did the heart <strong>of</strong> the Opposition<br />
beat with such an immutable conviction <strong>of</strong> its correctness. Never before was there such unanimity as now<br />
prevails.<br />
ZINOVIEV and KAMANEV: Absolutely correct! [Zinoviev and Kameney, as is well known, dld not hold out for<br />
long. -- L.T.]<br />
TROTSKY: Nor will there be any room for the gradual Centrist back-sliding with respect to biateri'l<br />
policies under the conditions <strong>of</strong> war. All the controversies will congeal, the class contradictions will<br />
become aggravated, the issues will be posed point-blank. It will be necessary to give clear and precise<br />
answers.<br />
Which do we need during war-time: "Revolutionary Unity" or "Union sacr(e"? <strong>The</strong> bourgeoisie has<br />
devised for the period <strong>of</strong> war and war danger a special political condition under the name <strong>of</strong> "civil peace"<br />
or "Union sacr(e." <strong>The</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong> this purely bourgeois concept is this, that the differences and<br />
squabbles <strong>of</strong> all bourgeois parties, including the social democracy, as well as internal disagreements<br />
within all parties must, you see, be silenced for the duration <strong>of</strong> the war-in the aim <strong>of</strong> the best possible<br />
befuddlement and deception <strong>of</strong> the masses. "Union sacr(e" is the highest form <strong>of</strong> the conspiracy <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rulers against the ruled. Needless to say, if our party has nothing to hide in the political sense from the<br />
working class during peace-time, then this is all the more true during war-time when the purity and<br />
clarity <strong>of</strong> the political line, the pr<strong>of</strong>undity <strong>of</strong> the ties with the masses are life-and- death questions. That is<br />
why, under the incomparably greater centralization <strong>of</strong> our party, as compared with any bourgeois party,<br />
we permitted ourselves in the heat <strong>of</strong> the civil war to discuss in the sharpest possible way and to resolve<br />
in a democratic party way, all the fundamental questions <strong>of</strong> political leadership. This was the inevitable<br />
overhead expense by means <strong>of</strong> which the party worked out and reinforced a correct line, and fortified its<br />
revolutionary unity. <strong>The</strong>re are -- rather it would be more correct to say, only yesterday we still had -comrades<br />
who thought that after the death <strong>of</strong> Lenin, the absolute correctness <strong>of</strong> the leadership among us<br />
was assured to such an extent that it no longer required to be checked upon by the party. We, on the other<br />
http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1937-st2/sf10.htm (6 <strong>of</strong> 10) [06/06/2002 15:07:07]