The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive
The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive
The Stalin school of falsification - Marxists Internet Archive
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Stalin</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Falsification -- Chapter 15<br />
Leon Trotsky's<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Stalin</strong> School Of Falsification<br />
Transcribed for the Trotsky <strong>Internet</strong> <strong>Archive</strong>, now a sub-archive <strong>of</strong> the Marxist writers' <strong>Internet</strong> <strong>Archive</strong><br />
by David Walters in 1997<br />
Chairman: Comrade Teodorovich.<br />
Secretaries: Comrades Boki and F. I. Drabkina.<br />
SESSION OF APRIL 1<br />
Order <strong>of</strong> the day: Tseretelli's proposal for unification.<br />
STALIN: We ought to go. It is necessary to define our proposals as to the terms <strong>of</strong> unification.<br />
Unification is possible along the lines <strong>of</strong> Zimmerwald-Kienthal.<br />
LUGANOVSKY: <strong>The</strong> Kharkov Committee is carrying on negotiations precisely along these lines.<br />
MOLOTOV: Tseretelli wants to unite heterogeneous elements. Tseretelli calls himself a Zimmerwaldist<br />
and a Kienthalist, and for this reason unification along these lines is Incorrect both politically and<br />
organizationally. It would be more correct to advance a definite internationalist socialist platform. We<br />
will unite a compact minority.<br />
LUGANOVSKY (in refuting comrade Molotov) says: At the present time we are unaware <strong>of</strong> any<br />
disagreements. <strong>The</strong> Mensheviks abstained in the Soviet and spoke more strongly than did . . . the<br />
Bolsheviks who came out against. Many disagreements have been outlived. It is out <strong>of</strong> place to<br />
underscore tactical differences. We can have a joint Congress with the Mensheviks, the Zimmerwaldists<br />
and Kienthalists.<br />
SKRYPNIK: This debate is purely a verbal one. Unification is possible only with those who reject<br />
revolutionary defensism and who share our attitude toward the Provisional Government.<br />
ZALUTSKY: If we enter into negotiations with the Mensheviks, we must put forward our own views.<br />
We proceed from a definite position. Only a petty bourgeois and not a social democrat can proceed from<br />
a mere desire for unification. <strong>The</strong>re is disagreement between us on the following questions:<br />
1) the attitude to war;<br />
2) the evaluation and role <strong>of</strong> the capitalist forces in the revolution. If we now slur over them, we<br />
will have a split within a week just the same. It is impossible to unite on the basis <strong>of</strong> a superficial<br />
Zimmerwald-Kienthal token. Teplovsky's argument that the "provinces will compel us to go to the<br />
Right" -- is wrong. He is a poor social democrat who will allow himself to become dissolved in the<br />
mass. It is necessary to lead the masses behind us. It is necessary to advance a definite program.<br />
http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1937-st2/sf15.htm (1 <strong>of</strong> 17) [06/06/2002 15:07:33]