27.06.2013 Views

Evolution and Optimum Seeking

Evolution and Optimum Seeking

Evolution and Optimum Seeking

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

92 R<strong>and</strong>om Strategies<br />

rearranging Equation (4.1), the number of trials is obtained<br />

N =<br />

ln (1 ; p)<br />

ln (1 ; v<br />

V )<br />

(4.2)<br />

that is required in order to place with probability p at least one trial in the volume v.<br />

Brooks concludes from this that the cost is independent ofthenumber of variables. In<br />

their criticism Hooke <strong>and</strong> Jeeves (1958) point out that it is not feasible to consider the<br />

accuracy in terms of the volume ratio for problems with many variables. For n = 100<br />

parameters, a volume ratio of v<br />

=0:1 corresponds to a length ratio of the side length<br />

V<br />

D of V <strong>and</strong> d of v of<br />

s<br />

d n v<br />

= ' 0:98<br />

D V<br />

This means that the uncertainty in the variables xi is 98% of the original interval [aibi],<br />

although the volume containing the optimum has been reduced to one tenth of the original.<br />

Shimizu (1969) makes the same mistake as Brooks <strong>and</strong> attempts to implement the strategy<br />

for problems with more general constraints.<br />

A comparison of the pure r<strong>and</strong>om search <strong>and</strong> deterministic search methods known at<br />

the time for experimental optimization problems (Brooks, 1959) also shows no advantage<br />

of the stochastic strategy. The test only covers four di erent objective functions, each<br />

with two variables. Brooks then recommends applying his r<strong>and</strong>om method if the number<br />

of parameters is large or if the determination of objective function values is subject to<br />

large perturbations. McArthur (1961) concludes on the basis of numerical experiments<br />

that the r<strong>and</strong>om strategy is also preferable for complicated problem structures. Just this<br />

circumstance has led to the use, even today, of the pure r<strong>and</strong>om search, often called<br />

the Monte-Carlo method, for example in computer optimization of building construction<br />

(Golinski <strong>and</strong> Lesniak, 1966 Lesniak, 1970 Hupfer, 1970).<br />

In principle, all the trials of the simple r<strong>and</strong>om strategy can be made simultaneously.<br />

It is thus numbered among the simultaneous optimization methods. The decision to<br />

choose a particular state vector of variables does not depend on the results of preceding<br />

trials, since the probability of scoring according to the uniform distribution is the same at<br />

all times. However, in applications on the traditional, serially operating computers, the<br />

trials must be made sequentially. This can be used to advantage by storing the current<br />

best value of the objective function <strong>and</strong> its associated variable value. In Chapter 3,<br />

Section 3.1.1 <strong>and</strong> 3.2 the grid or tabulation method was referred to as optimal in the<br />

minimax sense. The blind r<strong>and</strong>om strategy should thus not be any better. De ning the<br />

interval length Di = bi ; ai for the variable xi, with required accuracy di, <strong>and</strong> assuming<br />

that all the Di = D <strong>and</strong> di = d for i =1(1)n, then for the volume ratio in Equations<br />

(4.1) <strong>and</strong> (4.2)<br />

v<br />

V =<br />

If v<br />

is small, which when there are many variables must be the case, one can use the<br />

V<br />

approximation<br />

ln (1 + y) ' y for y 1<br />

d<br />

D<br />

! n

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!