27.06.2013 Views

Evolution and Optimum Seeking

Evolution and Optimum Seeking

Evolution and Optimum Seeking

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

216 Comparison of Direct Search Strategies for Parameter Optimization<br />

the whole of the optimization process, is a very clear advantage in solving constrained<br />

problems. Suitable combinations of variances are set up in this case before the smallest<br />

possible step lengths are reached. Thus the total computation time is reduced <strong>and</strong> the<br />

nal accuracy is better. The recombination option also appears to have a bene cial e ect<br />

at boundaries that are not explicit it clearly improves the chance that descendants, even<br />

with a larger step size, will be successful near the boundary. Inany case the population<br />

clusters more slowly together than when there is no recombination.<br />

Global Convergence Properties<br />

Among the 50 test problems there are 8 having at least a second local minimum besides<br />

the global one. In the reliability test, the accuracy achieved was only assessed with respect<br />

to the particular optimum that was being approximated. What now is the capability of<br />

each strategy for locating global minima? Several problems were speci cally designed to<br />

investigate this question by having very many local optima, namely Problems 2.3, 2.26,<br />

2.30, <strong>and</strong> 2.44. In Table 6.9 this aspect of the test results is evaluated.<br />

Except for one problem (Problem 2.32), whose global minimum was found by all the<br />

strategies under test, the method of Rosenbrock onlyconverged to local optima. The<br />

complex method <strong>and</strong> the (1+1) evolution strategy were only better in one case: namely,<br />

in Problem 2.45 they both approached the global minimum.<br />

Table 6.9: Results of all strategies in the second comparison test:<br />

global convergence properties<br />

Problem F G L H D D P D S R C E G R<br />

I O A O S S O F I O O V R E<br />

B L G J C C W P M S M O U K<br />

No. O D R E G P E S P E P L P O<br />

2.3 L1 L1 L3 L1 L7 L7 L1 L3 L1 L6 L1 Lm G G<br />

2.36 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 G G<br />

2.30 L4 L1 Lm G G<br />

2.32 G G G G G<br />

2.44 L1 L1 L1 G G<br />

2.45 L G G G G<br />

2.47 L3 L1 L2 G G<br />

2.48 L2 Lm Lm GL GL<br />

Meaning of symbols:<br />

L Search converges to local minimum.<br />

L3 Search converges to the 3rd local minimum (in order of decreasing objective<br />

function values).<br />

Lm Search converges to various local minima depending on the r<strong>and</strong>om numbers.<br />

G Search converges to global minimum.<br />

GL Search converges to local or global minimum depending on the r<strong>and</strong>om numbers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!