27.06.2013 Views

Evolution and Optimum Seeking

Evolution and Optimum Seeking

Evolution and Optimum Seeking

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

134 <strong>Evolution</strong> Strategies for Numerical Optimization<br />

Both the (1 , ) <strong>and</strong> (1+ )schemes were run on the computer for the sphere model,<br />

with n = 100rE = 100, <strong>and</strong> variable . In each case' was evaluated over 10 000<br />

generations. The resulting data are shown in terms of ' <strong>and</strong> in Figure 5.9. In<br />

comparison with the approximate theory, deviations are apparent mainly for > opt .<br />

The skewness of the probability distribution w(s 0 ) <strong>and</strong> the error in the estimate of the<br />

integral R D(y) dy have only a weak e ect in the region of greatest interest, where the<br />

rate of progress is maximum. Furthermore, the results of the simulation fall closer to<br />

the approximate theory if n is taken to be greater than 100 however, the computation<br />

time then becomes excessive. For large values of the possible survival of the parent<br />

only becomes noticeable when the variance is too large to allow rapid convergence. The<br />

greatest di erences, as expected, appear for =1.<br />

On the whole we see that the theory worked out here gives at least a qualitative<br />

account ofthebehavior of the (1 , ) strategy. Amuch more elegant method yielding an<br />

even better approximation may be found in Back, Rudolph, <strong>and</strong> Schwefel (1993), or Beyer<br />

(1993, 1994a,b).<br />

5.2.2.3 The Corridor Model<br />

As a third <strong>and</strong> last model objective function, we will now consider the right-angled corridor.<br />

The contours of F (x) in the two dimensional picture (Fig. 5.11) are straight <strong>and</strong><br />

parallel, but not necessarily equidistant.<br />

F (x) =c0 +<br />

For the sake of simplifying the calculation we will again give the coordinate system a<br />

particular position <strong>and</strong> orientation with c1 = ;1 ci = 0 for all i = 2 3:::n: The<br />

right-angled corridor (Problem 2.37, see Appendix A, Sect. A.2){we are using here three<br />

dimensional concepts for the essentially n-dimensional case{is de ned by constraints of<br />

the form<br />

Gj(x) =jxjj b for j = 2(1)n<br />

It has the width 2 b for all coordinate directions xi i = 2(1)n hence the cross section<br />

(2 b) n;1 . As a starting point, the position xE of the parent E, wechoose the origin with<br />

respect to x1 = 0. The useful part of a r<strong>and</strong>om step is just its component z1 in the<br />

x1 direction, which is the negative gradient direction. The formulae for w(s` = s 0 ) <strong>and</strong><br />

p(s`

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!