22.07.2013 Views

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2<br />

Events / 20 MeV/c<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

LHCb<br />

Preliminary<br />

s = 7 TeV<br />

6100 6200 6300 6400 6500<br />

±<br />

2<br />

M(J/ ψπ<br />

) (MeV/c )<br />

2<br />

Events / 10 MeV/c<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

LHCb<br />

Preliminary<br />

s<br />

= 7 TeV<br />

5200 5300 5400 5500<br />

±<br />

2<br />

M(J/ ψK<br />

) (MeV/c )<br />

Figure 3: The invariant mass distribution for B + c → J/ψ(µ + µ − ) π + (left) <strong>and</strong> B + → J/ψ K + (right) c<strong>and</strong>idates,<br />

with the fit results superimposed. The blue solid line represents the total fit function, the red dashed line the<br />

signal contribution, the green dashed line the combinatorial background contribution. For the B + → J/ψ K +<br />

mass distribution, the red solid line represents the background from Cabibbo-suppressed B + → J/ψ π + <strong>de</strong>cays.<br />

The analysis has been performed in the fiducial region B pT > 4 GeV/c <strong>and</strong> B pseudo-rapidity<br />

η ∈ [2.5;4.5] using 32.5 pb−1 of integrated luminosity. The B + c <strong>and</strong> B+ selection criteria have<br />

been chosen to be as similar as possible to reduce the systematic uncertainties on Rc +. The<br />

number of B + c <strong>and</strong> B + have been extracted from a fit to the J/ψ π <strong>and</strong> J/ψ K invariant mass<br />

distributions (see Figure 3). In both cases a Gaussian shape has been used for the signal <strong>and</strong><br />

an exponential shape has been used for the combinatorial background. The non-combinatorial<br />

background from the Cabibbo suppressed <strong>de</strong>cay B + → J/ψ π + has also been taken into account.<br />

Since the B + c production spectrum <strong>and</strong> lifetime are poorly known, the efficiency has been evaluated<br />

from Monte Carlo simulation in bins of B pT <strong>and</strong> η to reduce the <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce on theoretical<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>ls. The measured Rc + in the fiducial region is Rc + = (2.2 ± 0.8 ± 0.2)% where the first<br />

uncertainty is statistical <strong>and</strong> the second is systematic. A mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>de</strong>pendant approach obtained<br />

with the B + c generator BCVEGPY 10 (i.e. a complete LO α 4 s<br />

PDF gives R mo<strong>de</strong>l-<strong>de</strong>pendant<br />

c +<br />

6 Conclusions<br />

= (1.4 ± 0.4 ± 0.1)%.<br />

calculation) <strong>and</strong> the CTEQ6LL 11<br />

With the 2010 data the differential production cross-sections of J/ψ <strong>and</strong> Υ(1S) <strong>and</strong> the production<br />

cross-section of double J/ψ <strong>and</strong> B + c (relative to B + ) have been measured with the LHCb<br />

<strong>de</strong>tector. The results are in good agreement with the theoretical calculations <strong>and</strong> the observation<br />

of the B + c looks very promising for future measurements.<br />

References<br />

1. The LHCb Collaboration, A.A. Alves et al, JINST 3, S08005 (2008).<br />

2. The LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al, arXiv:1103.0423v1 [hep-ex].<br />

3. The LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al, Phys. Lett. B 694, 209 (2010).<br />

4. The LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al, CERN-LHCb-CONF-<strong>2011</strong>-009.<br />

5. A.V. Berezhnoy et al, arXiv:1101.5881v1 [hep-ph].<br />

6. The LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al, CERN-LHCb-CONF-<strong>2011</strong>-016.<br />

7. K. Wang, Y.Q. Ma, K.T. Chao, private communication.<br />

8. The CMS Collaboration, arXiv:1012.5545v1.<br />

9. The LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al, CERN-LHCb-CONF-<strong>2011</strong>-017.<br />

10. Chao-Hsi Chang, Jian-Xiong Wang, Xing-Gang Wu, Comput.Phys.Commun. 175, 624<br />

(2006).<br />

11. J. Pumplin et al, JHEP 0207, 012 (2002).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!