22.07.2013 Views

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

is significantly larger than both p+p cases, which is not surprising due to the clear ridge <strong>and</strong><br />

shoul<strong>de</strong>r structure. This enhancement is much larger than simply quenching the away-si<strong>de</strong><br />

jet can provi<strong>de</strong>, which means there must be some other source which contributes to this strong<br />

enhancement. At the current stage, we do not know what the main sources for this enhancement<br />

is. Also notable is that the C4 term seems to have some excess compared to p+p.<br />

In conclusion, PHENIX has measured the higher harmonics, v2, v3 <strong>and</strong> v4 in various centrality<br />

<strong>and</strong> pT combinations with two different methods. The measured v3 is <strong>de</strong>scribed well by<br />

hydrodynamical calculations. When studying the Fourier spectra of the jet functions (with v2<br />

shape background subtracted) in Au+Au compared to p+p, we see that the third harmonic, C3,<br />

is significantly larger in Au+Au, which indicates some source other than the jet contributes to<br />

this anomalous enhancement.<br />

References<br />

n<br />

C<br />

PHENIX preliminary<br />

JF( Δφ)=<br />

Σ(C<br />

cos(nΔφ))<br />

n<br />

0.08<br />

0.06<br />

0.04<br />

0.02<br />

0<br />

Au+Au, s =200GeV<br />

NN<br />

inc. γ-h<br />

(v<br />

2.0-3.0x1.0-2.0 GeV/c<br />

00-20%<br />

20-40%<br />

40-60%<br />

60-90%<br />

pp, full<br />

pp, near only<br />

subtracted)<br />

2<br />

0 2 4 6 8<br />

Figure 3: Fourier spectra of Au+Au jet functions in different centralities <strong>and</strong> compare with p+p.<br />

1. A. Adare et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 232301 (2008).<br />

2. A. Adare et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 062301 (2010).<br />

3. B. Alver <strong>and</strong> G. Rol<strong>and</strong>, Phys. Rev. C 81, 054905 (2010).<br />

4. A. Adare et al, arXiv:1105.3928.<br />

5. S. S. Adler et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 052301 (2006).<br />

6. A. Adare et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 232302 (2007).<br />

7. A. Adare et al, Phys. Rev. C 78, 014901 (2008).<br />

8. B. I. Abelev et al, Phys. Rev. C 80, 064912 (2010).<br />

9. B. I. Abelev et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 062301 (2010).<br />

10. B. Alver et al, Phys. Rev. C 82, 034913 (2010).<br />

n

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!