22.07.2013 Views

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

q T<br />

1/R AA<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

LO Fragmentation Contribution<br />

√ ⎯ S = 5.5 TeV, CTEQ6.6M , no Isolation<br />

|y Q, |, |y γ |12 GeV<br />

R = 1000, ω c =50 GeV<br />

γ+b<br />

γ+c<br />

20 40 60<br />

q T<br />

Figure 4: a) The ratio of the LO vacuum fragmentation contribution to the medium fragmentation contribution<br />

for γ + c (black line) <strong>and</strong> γ + b (red line) production.<br />

4 Conclusion<br />

Prompt photon + heavy-quark jet production has proven to be an extremely useful <strong>and</strong> versatile<br />

process. It can can be employed to constrain the heavy quark PDFs in hadron-hadron collisions,<br />

while measurements in p − A collisions can help constrain the gluon nPDF.<br />

In heavy-ion collisions it can help estimate the quenching experienced by a heavy jet, while<br />

also providing access to the mass hierarchy of parton energy loss.<br />

References<br />

1. T. Stavreva <strong>and</strong> J. Owens, Phys.Rev. D79 (2009) 054017 [0901.3791].<br />

2. D0 Collaboration, V. M. Abazov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 192002<br />

[0901.0739].<br />

3. T. Stavreva et al., JHEP 01 (<strong>2011</strong>) 152 [1012.1178].<br />

4. I. Schienbein et al., Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 054013 [0710.4897].<br />

5. I. Schienbein et al., Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 094004 [0907.2357].<br />

6. K. Kovarik, I. Schienbein, F. Olness, J. Yu, C. Keppel et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 106 (<strong>2011</strong>)<br />

122301 [1012.0286].<br />

7. M. Hirai, S. Kumano <strong>and</strong> T. H. Nagai, Phys. Rev. C76 (2007) 065207 [0709.3038].<br />

8. K. J. Eskola, H. Paukkunen <strong>and</strong> C. A. Salgado, JHEP 04 (2009) 065 [0902.4154].<br />

9. F. Arleo, K. J. Eskola, H. Paukkunen <strong>and</strong> C. A. Salgado, JHEP 04 (<strong>2011</strong>) 055<br />

[1103.1471].<br />

10. X.-N. Wang, Z. Huang <strong>and</strong> I. Sarcevic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 231<br />

[hep-ph/9605213].<br />

11. F. Arleo, P. Aurenche, Z. Belghobsi <strong>and</strong> J.-P. Guillet, JHEP 11 (2004) 009<br />

[hep-ph/0410088].<br />

12. Y. L. Dokshitzer <strong>and</strong> D. E. Kharzeev, Phys. Lett. B519 (2001) 199–206<br />

[hep-ph/0106202].<br />

13. N. Armesto, A. Dainese, C. A. Salgado <strong>and</strong> U. A. Wie<strong>de</strong>mann, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005)<br />

054027 [hep-ph/0501225].<br />

14. F. Arleo, I. Schienbein <strong>and</strong> T. Stavreva, Work in Progress.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!