22.07.2013 Views

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The lower bound for the integration variable µ 2 is usually set to the multi-particle threshold m 2 γ<br />

in the KL representation. In this work we have modified it into 4<br />

µ 2 ⎧<br />

⎪⎨<br />

c =<br />

⎪⎩<br />

cs, s > m2 m<br />

γ<br />

2 γ, s ≤ m2 γ<br />

, (11)<br />

where the free parameter c of or<strong>de</strong>r unity will be fixed later. This modification respects the<br />

multi-particle threshold, <strong>and</strong> at the same time guarantees a finite integral in Eq. (10).<br />

We obtain the dressed propagator<br />

S q (p) =<br />

with the <strong>de</strong>finitions<br />

/p + mq<br />

p 2 − m 2 q<br />

− 1<br />

2 i(γα /pγ βGαβ − mqγαGαβγβ) (p2 − m2 q) 2<br />

− παs⟨G 2 αβ ⟩mq/p(mq + /p)<br />

(p 2 − m 2 q) 4<br />

Î q<br />

1,2f(µ) ≡<br />

∫ ∞<br />

m 2 γ<br />

[<br />

+ /p Îq 1<br />

] exp[c(p2 − µ 2 )/µ 2 ]<br />

+ Îq 2<br />

p2 − µ 2 , (12)<br />

dµ 2 ρ q<br />

1,2 (µ2 )f(µ). (13)<br />

The second <strong>and</strong> third terms on the right h<strong>and</strong> si<strong>de</strong> of Eq. (12) arise from the background gluon<br />

field 5,6 , <strong>and</strong> the forth term comes from the nonlocal quark con<strong>de</strong>nsates with the integrations<br />

over µ 2 <strong>and</strong> s being exchanged in Eq. (10). We <strong>de</strong>fine the distribution functions<br />

fs(s) =<br />

fv(s) =<br />

−3<br />

4π2 ⟨qq⟩<br />

3<br />

2π2 ⟨qq⟩<br />

∫ ∞<br />

µ 2 c<br />

∫ ∞<br />

<strong>and</strong> parameterize the spectral <strong>de</strong>nsity functions as<br />

µ 2 c<br />

dµ 2 e −µ2 /s ρ q<br />

2 (µ2 ), (14)<br />

dµ 2 e −µ2 /s sρ q<br />

1 (µ2 ), (15)<br />

ρ q<br />

1 (µ2 ) = N1 exp(−aµ 2 )/µ, ρ q<br />

2 (µ2 ) = N2 exp(−aµ 2 ). (16)<br />

The choice of µ 2 c in Eq. (11) then ren<strong>de</strong>rs the integral in Eq. (14)<br />

fs(s) ∝<br />

s<br />

1 + as exp(−µ2 c/s − aµ 2 c), (17)<br />

exhibit the limiting behaviors exp(−m 2 γ/s) at small s <strong>and</strong> exp(−acs) at large s, consistent with<br />

exp(−m 2 γ/s) <strong>and</strong> the exponential ansatz exp(−σqs) postulated in the literature 7,8 , respectively.<br />

The threshold mass mγ is expected to take a value of or<strong>de</strong>r of the constituent quark mass 9 , <strong>and</strong><br />

set to mγ ∼ 0.36 GeV below.<br />

Comparing the Taylor expansion of the nonlocal quark con<strong>de</strong>nsates 2,8 with Eq. (10), we<br />

have the constraints<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

fs(s)ds = 1,<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

sfs(s)ds = 1<br />

2 (λ2 q − m 2 q),<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

fv(s)ds = mq, (18)<br />

which <strong>de</strong>termine the free parameters a, N1 <strong>and</strong> N2 in Eq. (16), given values of λq <strong>and</strong> mq. The<br />

average virtuality λq <strong>and</strong> the lower bound c in Eq. (11), being not known with certainty, are<br />

fixed by fits to the data of the pion <strong>de</strong>cay constant fπ = 0.1307. In Fig. 1(b) we display the<br />

allowed values of c <strong>and</strong> λq as a curve in the c-λq plane. We adopt λq = 0.75 GeV <strong>and</strong> c = 0.3,<br />

<strong>and</strong> choose the light quark masses mu = 4.2 MeV <strong>and</strong> md = 7.5 MeV. We then solve for the free<br />

parameters a, N1 <strong>and</strong> N2 from the constraints in Eq. (18), whose results are listed in Table 1.<br />

The opposite signs of N1 <strong>and</strong> N2 imply the violation of positivity, which can be interpreted as a<br />

manifestation of confinement 10 . The fixed parameters are then employed to calculate the pion<br />

form factor, <strong>and</strong> the results are shown in Fig. 1(c). It is obvious that our results are consistent<br />

with the experimental data for Q 2 > 1GeV 2 , the region where QSR are applicable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!