22.07.2013 Views

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 Heavy Quark <strong>Energy</strong> Loss in γ + Q Production<br />

The study of two-particle final states in heavy-ion collisions provi<strong>de</strong>s a much more versatile<br />

access to quantifying the energy loss in the Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP), as compared to the<br />

study of a single inclusive process. This is further the case if one of the final-state particles<br />

is medium insensitive, in particular the study of γ+jet 10 or γ+hadron 11 correlations helps to<br />

evaluate the amount of quenching experienced by jets as they traverse the medium while the<br />

photon’s energy serves as a gauge of the initial parton energy. Here, the focus on the associated<br />

production of γ+heavy jet can help clarify the energy loss in the heavy quark sector. Currently,<br />

due to the <strong>de</strong>ad cone effect a <strong>de</strong>finite hierarchy of the energy loss is expected, ɛq > ɛc > ɛb, with<br />

the heavier quarks losing less energy 12 . This hierarchy remains to be clarified experimentally,<br />

<strong>and</strong> prompt photon + heavy-quark jet production is a natural <strong>and</strong> promising process for this<br />

verification.<br />

In Fig. 3a) we show the effects of the medium on the leading or<strong>de</strong>r (LO) differential crosssection<br />

versus pT γ <strong>and</strong> pT Q. The energy loss of the heavy quark, ɛQ, is computed on an event<br />

by event basis, with the use of the quenching weight obtained perturbatively 13 . These effects<br />

show up in the difference between dσγ+c;med <strong>and</strong> dpT Q<br />

dσγ+c;vac<br />

dσmed<br />

. The small difference between dpT Q<br />

pT γ<br />

<strong>and</strong> dσvac<br />

pT γ<br />

at low pT is due to experimental cuts. However, we need not limit ourselves to only<br />

one-particle observables as the information obtained by investigating the correlations of the two<br />

final state particles (e.g. photon-jet energy asymmetry, momentum imbalance, photon-jet pair<br />

momentum 11 ) provi<strong>de</strong>s a much better h<strong>and</strong>le on the amount of energy loss. In Fig. 3b) we focus<br />

in more <strong>de</strong>tail on the differential cross-section as a function of the photon-jet pair momentum,<br />

q⊥ = |pT γ + pT Q|. At LO accuracy, for the direct contribution one has q⊥ ɛQ, whereas for<br />

the fragmentation contribution the shift between the qT spectrum in vacuum versus the one<br />

in medium is given by < ɛQ >. Unfortunately when one investigates two-particle observables<br />

for this process at LO, only the fragmentation contributions in medium <strong>and</strong> in vacuum can be<br />

compared, as due to the kinematic constraints the direct component in vacuum is non-zero only<br />

when qT = 0. In Fig. 4 the fragmentation contributions in medium to γ +c <strong>and</strong> γ +b normalized<br />

to the p − p case are shown. Clearly ∆Ec > ∆Eb at small qT , while as qT grows the difference<br />

disappears, as the quenching weight <strong>de</strong>pends on m/E, which becomes similar for charm <strong>and</strong><br />

bottom quarks at large qT . However, <strong>de</strong>finite conclusions can only be drawn after a study at<br />

NLO accuracy 14 .<br />

dσ/dp T [pb/GeV]<br />

100<br />

10<br />

1<br />

0.1<br />

0.01<br />

0.001<br />

γ+c at LO<br />

√ ⎯ S = 5.5 TeV, CTEQ6.6M , no Isolation<br />

|y Q, |, |y γ |12 GeV<br />

R = 1000, ω c =50 GeV<br />

p Tγ no EL<br />

p Tγ EL<br />

p TQ no EL<br />

p TQ EL<br />

50 100 150<br />

p Tγ (p TQ ) [GeV]<br />

dσ/dq T<br />

100<br />

1<br />

0.01<br />

0.0001<br />

1e-06<br />

√ ⎯ S = 5.5 TeV, CTEQ6.6M , no Isolation<br />

|y Q, |, |y γ |12 GeV<br />

R = 1000, ω c =50 GeV<br />

γ+c<br />

γ+b (x0.01)<br />

γ+c LO no EL<br />

γ+c LO EL<br />

γ+c LO EL - direct<br />

γ+c LO EL - fragm<br />

γ+b LO no EL<br />

γ+b LO EL<br />

γ+b LO EL - direct<br />

γ+b LO EL - fragm<br />

20 40 60<br />

q T<br />

Figure 3: a) The LO γ + c differential cross-section versus: pT γ in vacuum (solid black line), in medium (dashed<br />

black line); pT Q in vacuum (solid red line), in medium (dashed red line). b) The LO differential cross-section<br />

versus q⊥ for γ + c <strong>and</strong> γ + b, showing the fragmenation <strong>and</strong> direct contributions in vacuum <strong>and</strong> in medium.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!