22.07.2013 Views

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

| y|<br />

< 0.3 ATLAS Preliminary<br />

2.1 < | y|<br />

< 2.8 ATLAS Preliminary<br />

24<br />

10<br />

12<br />

anti-k jets, R=0.6<br />

| y | < 0.3 ( × 10 )<br />

1<br />

t<br />

9<br />

21<br />

-1<br />

0.3 < | y|<br />

< 0.8 ( × 10 )<br />

10<br />

6<br />

∫ L dt=37 pb , s=7<br />

TeV<br />

0.8 < | y|<br />

< 1.2 ( × 10 )<br />

3<br />

0.5<br />

0.5<br />

18<br />

1.2 < | y|<br />

< 2.1 ( × 10 )<br />

0<br />

10<br />

2.1 < | y|<br />

< 2.8 ( × 10 )<br />

-3<br />

2.8 < | y|<br />

< 3.6 ( × 10 )<br />

15<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

1.5<br />

0.3 < | y|<br />

< 0.8<br />

-6<br />

10<br />

3.6 < | y|<br />

< 4.4 ( × 10 )<br />

12<br />

10<br />

1.5<br />

9<br />

0.8 < | y|<br />

< 1.2<br />

10<br />

6<br />

10<br />

3<br />

10<br />

1.5<br />

1.2 < | y|<br />

< 2.1<br />

1<br />

-3<br />

10<br />

Systematic<br />

uncertainties<br />

2<br />

3<br />

-6<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

NLO p<strong>QCD</strong> (CTEQ 6.6) ×<br />

p [GeV]<br />

T<br />

Non-pert. corr.<br />

-9<br />

ATLAS Preliminary xx x<br />

x<br />

x<br />

xx x<br />

x<br />

x<br />

xx x<br />

x<br />

x<br />

xx xx<br />

x<br />

1 x<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

1.5<br />

2.8 < | y|<br />

< 3.6<br />

0.5<br />

xx x<br />

x xx x<br />

xx<br />

0.5<br />

1.5<br />

3.6 < | y < 4.4<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

2<br />

3<br />

10<br />

10 xx x<br />

p [GeV] x xx x|<br />

0.5<br />

2<br />

3<br />

10<br />

10<br />

p [GeV]<br />

T<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

2<br />

3<br />

10<br />

10<br />

p [GeV]<br />

T<br />

10<br />

xx xx<br />

xx xx<br />

xx xx<br />

xx xx<br />

2<br />

3<br />

10<br />

10<br />

p [GeV]<br />

T<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xx xx xx<br />

Data with<br />

xstatistical error<br />

Systematic<br />

xuncertainties<br />

xx xx<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xCTEQ<br />

6.6<br />

xx<br />

xx xx xx<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xx xx xx<br />

MSTW 2008<br />

xx<br />

xx xx xx<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xx xx<br />

NNPDF 2.1<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

xx<br />

HERAPDF 1.5<br />

Figure 2: Inclusive jet double-differential cross section as a function of jet pT in different regions of |y| for jets<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntified using the anti-kT algorithm with R = 0.6.<br />

contributions as a function of the jet pT for the central region. The total uncertainty is lower<br />

than 4.5% for all jets with pT > 20GeV with the dominant contribution coming from the<br />

calorimeter uncertainty.<br />

The uncertainty for other pseudorapidity regions is assessed using in-situ di-jet intercalibration10<br />

. Figure 1 (right) shows the fractional JES uncertainty in the forward region as a function<br />

of jet pT. The total JES uncertainty amounts to about 14% with the intercalibration uncertainty<br />

as a dominant source.<br />

3 Cross section measurements<br />

[pb/GeV]<br />

d y<br />

T<br />

σ /d p<br />

2<br />

d<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx<br />

x<br />

x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x xx<br />

xx x xx<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

1.5<br />

1.5<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x xxx<br />

x xxx<br />

x xx<br />

Ratio wrt CTEQ 6.6<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x xx<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xxx<br />

x xx<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xxx<br />

xx<br />

x<br />

xx<br />

x<br />

x<br />

xx<br />

x<br />

x<br />

xx<br />

x<br />

xx x xx<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xxx<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xxx<br />

x xx<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xxx<br />

xx<br />

x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xxx<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xxx<br />

xxx<br />

x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

xx x<br />

ATLAS measurements of inclusive jet cross sections 3 are performed as a function of jet pT in<br />

7 bins of jet rapidity up to |y| < 4.4. The measured cross section is corrected for experimental<br />

effects, like <strong>de</strong>tector inefficiencies, resolution <strong>and</strong> trigger effects back to the hadronic final state<br />

using bin-by-bin unfolding calculated from Monte Carlo (PYTHIA, MC10 tune). The corrected<br />

spectrum is compared to NLO <strong>QCD</strong> theoretical predictions, calculated with the NLOJET++<br />

program <strong>and</strong> CTEQ 6.6 NLO parton <strong>de</strong>nsity functions (PDF) as a baseline. NLO calculations<br />

are corrected for non-perturbative effects to account for hadronization <strong>and</strong> un<strong>de</strong>rlying events.<br />

The corrections are evaluated from the ratio of the cross section with <strong>and</strong> without hadronisation<br />

<strong>and</strong> un<strong>de</strong>rlying event obtained from leading-logarithmic parton shower generators (PYTHIA,<br />

AMBT1 tune).<br />

Figure 2 (left) shows both measured <strong>and</strong> predicted (using CTEQ 6.6 PDF set) doubledifferential<br />

inclusive jet cross section as a function of jet pT in seven rapidity regions for anti-kT<br />

jets with R = 0.6. The experimental uncertainty (blue b<strong>and</strong>) stays within 10-40 % over the<br />

full kinematic range studied, with the dominant contribution from the JES uncertainty. The<br />

theoretical uncertainty (yellow b<strong>and</strong>), largely coming from uncertainty of PDFs, is on the level<br />

of the experimental one. A comparison of the measured cross section with predictions obtained<br />

using the CTEQ 6.6, MTSW 2008, NNPDF 2.1, <strong>and</strong> HERAPDF 1.5 PDF sets is shown in Figure<br />

2 (right). The data points <strong>and</strong> the error b<strong>and</strong>s are normalized to the theoretical predictions<br />

obtained by using the CTEQ 6.6 PDF set. Predictions using HERAPDF 1.5 appeared to follow<br />

the data most closely, though consistency within experimental <strong>and</strong> theoretical uncertainties with<br />

most other PDF sets is observed.<br />

A first <strong>de</strong>dicated study of multi-jet final states 6 for events containing two or more jets with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!