2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...
2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...
2011 QCD and High Energy Interactions - Rencontres de Moriond ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
| y|<br />
< 0.3 ATLAS Preliminary<br />
2.1 < | y|<br />
< 2.8 ATLAS Preliminary<br />
24<br />
10<br />
12<br />
anti-k jets, R=0.6<br />
| y | < 0.3 ( × 10 )<br />
1<br />
t<br />
9<br />
21<br />
-1<br />
0.3 < | y|<br />
< 0.8 ( × 10 )<br />
10<br />
6<br />
∫ L dt=37 pb , s=7<br />
TeV<br />
0.8 < | y|<br />
< 1.2 ( × 10 )<br />
3<br />
0.5<br />
0.5<br />
18<br />
1.2 < | y|<br />
< 2.1 ( × 10 )<br />
0<br />
10<br />
2.1 < | y|<br />
< 2.8 ( × 10 )<br />
-3<br />
2.8 < | y|<br />
< 3.6 ( × 10 )<br />
15<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
1.5<br />
0.3 < | y|<br />
< 0.8<br />
-6<br />
10<br />
3.6 < | y|<br />
< 4.4 ( × 10 )<br />
12<br />
10<br />
1.5<br />
9<br />
0.8 < | y|<br />
< 1.2<br />
10<br />
6<br />
10<br />
3<br />
10<br />
1.5<br />
1.2 < | y|<br />
< 2.1<br />
1<br />
-3<br />
10<br />
Systematic<br />
uncertainties<br />
2<br />
3<br />
-6<br />
10<br />
10<br />
10<br />
NLO p<strong>QCD</strong> (CTEQ 6.6) ×<br />
p [GeV]<br />
T<br />
Non-pert. corr.<br />
-9<br />
ATLAS Preliminary xx x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
xx x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
xx x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
xx xx<br />
x<br />
1 x<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
1.5<br />
2.8 < | y|<br />
< 3.6<br />
0.5<br />
xx x<br />
x xx x<br />
xx<br />
0.5<br />
1.5<br />
3.6 < | y < 4.4<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
2<br />
3<br />
10<br />
10 xx x<br />
p [GeV] x xx x|<br />
0.5<br />
2<br />
3<br />
10<br />
10<br />
p [GeV]<br />
T<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
2<br />
3<br />
10<br />
10<br />
p [GeV]<br />
T<br />
10<br />
xx xx<br />
xx xx<br />
xx xx<br />
xx xx<br />
2<br />
3<br />
10<br />
10<br />
p [GeV]<br />
T<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xx xx xx<br />
Data with<br />
xstatistical error<br />
Systematic<br />
xuncertainties<br />
xx xx<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xCTEQ<br />
6.6<br />
xx<br />
xx xx xx<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xx xx xx<br />
MSTW 2008<br />
xx<br />
xx xx xx<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xx xx<br />
NNPDF 2.1<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
xx<br />
HERAPDF 1.5<br />
Figure 2: Inclusive jet double-differential cross section as a function of jet pT in different regions of |y| for jets<br />
i<strong>de</strong>ntified using the anti-kT algorithm with R = 0.6.<br />
contributions as a function of the jet pT for the central region. The total uncertainty is lower<br />
than 4.5% for all jets with pT > 20GeV with the dominant contribution coming from the<br />
calorimeter uncertainty.<br />
The uncertainty for other pseudorapidity regions is assessed using in-situ di-jet intercalibration10<br />
. Figure 1 (right) shows the fractional JES uncertainty in the forward region as a function<br />
of jet pT. The total JES uncertainty amounts to about 14% with the intercalibration uncertainty<br />
as a dominant source.<br />
3 Cross section measurements<br />
[pb/GeV]<br />
d y<br />
T<br />
σ /d p<br />
2<br />
d<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx<br />
x<br />
x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x xx<br />
xx x xx<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
1.5<br />
1.5<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x xxx<br />
x xxx<br />
x xx<br />
Ratio wrt CTEQ 6.6<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x xx<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xxx<br />
x xx<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xxx<br />
xx<br />
x<br />
xx<br />
x<br />
x<br />
xx<br />
x<br />
x<br />
xx<br />
x<br />
xx x xx<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xxx<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xxx<br />
x xx<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xxx<br />
xx<br />
x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xxx<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xxx<br />
xxx<br />
x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
xx x<br />
ATLAS measurements of inclusive jet cross sections 3 are performed as a function of jet pT in<br />
7 bins of jet rapidity up to |y| < 4.4. The measured cross section is corrected for experimental<br />
effects, like <strong>de</strong>tector inefficiencies, resolution <strong>and</strong> trigger effects back to the hadronic final state<br />
using bin-by-bin unfolding calculated from Monte Carlo (PYTHIA, MC10 tune). The corrected<br />
spectrum is compared to NLO <strong>QCD</strong> theoretical predictions, calculated with the NLOJET++<br />
program <strong>and</strong> CTEQ 6.6 NLO parton <strong>de</strong>nsity functions (PDF) as a baseline. NLO calculations<br />
are corrected for non-perturbative effects to account for hadronization <strong>and</strong> un<strong>de</strong>rlying events.<br />
The corrections are evaluated from the ratio of the cross section with <strong>and</strong> without hadronisation<br />
<strong>and</strong> un<strong>de</strong>rlying event obtained from leading-logarithmic parton shower generators (PYTHIA,<br />
AMBT1 tune).<br />
Figure 2 (left) shows both measured <strong>and</strong> predicted (using CTEQ 6.6 PDF set) doubledifferential<br />
inclusive jet cross section as a function of jet pT in seven rapidity regions for anti-kT<br />
jets with R = 0.6. The experimental uncertainty (blue b<strong>and</strong>) stays within 10-40 % over the<br />
full kinematic range studied, with the dominant contribution from the JES uncertainty. The<br />
theoretical uncertainty (yellow b<strong>and</strong>), largely coming from uncertainty of PDFs, is on the level<br />
of the experimental one. A comparison of the measured cross section with predictions obtained<br />
using the CTEQ 6.6, MTSW 2008, NNPDF 2.1, <strong>and</strong> HERAPDF 1.5 PDF sets is shown in Figure<br />
2 (right). The data points <strong>and</strong> the error b<strong>and</strong>s are normalized to the theoretical predictions<br />
obtained by using the CTEQ 6.6 PDF set. Predictions using HERAPDF 1.5 appeared to follow<br />
the data most closely, though consistency within experimental <strong>and</strong> theoretical uncertainties with<br />
most other PDF sets is observed.<br />
A first <strong>de</strong>dicated study of multi-jet final states 6 for events containing two or more jets with