Human Rights at Home and Abroad: Past, Present, and Future

working in the world now than ever before, new self-experiments are starting all the time. There
are still many questions left to answer and many stories yet to be written. (2005, p. 176)
The benefits from self-experimentation can put others in better safety, but the Nuremberg Code and new
experimentation oath should be mandatory for these brave scientists as well. They are human and should
be protected in every aspect. Also, scientists should choose whether they would like to have volunteer
subjects or choose to conduct the experiments on their own bodies. It should depend on the data they want
to collect to better determine the outcome of their specific experiment.
For example, ―Koichiro Fujita of the Tokyo Medical and Dental University, has been swallowing
tapeworm eggs off and on since 1996, hoping that the worms living in his intestine will make his allergies
better‖ (Boring & Dendy, 2005, p. 176). After Koichiro studied in third world countries and helped in
removing infectious parasites and worms from the local people, he discovered that they were more
susceptible to gain allergies. These allergies could be to different types of foods and other substances, but
he found it intriguing to know that allergies were increasing for the people he had removed the parasites
and worms from. Even though the worms are supposed to decrease the body‘s immune system, he
hypothesized that if he were to inject himself with these types of tape worms, his allergies would
decrease. Scientists who are in a rush to know answers can find a better way to experiment. With the help
of the Nuremberg Code and a new experimentation oath, scientists can be less afraid and choose to use
volunteer human test subjects instead of themselves.
The right criteria for conducting a human experiment should be created by making the
Nuremburg Code and researcher oath mandatory, as well as making sure the test subject is safe and aware
of the experiment; so why is all of this important? Well, by making these criteria a reality, many things in
the future can improve. If these guidelines were enforced, there would be less controversy over whether
human experimentation is ethical and would not violate human rights. Attempts are starting to be made to
lessen controversy from organizations like the Department of Veterans Affairs, who also care for patient
rights by continually: ―working to ensure the highest standards of human subjects' protections in all of its
research activities‖ (Burris, Feussner, Lavori & McGlynn, 2002, V-11). Organizations attempts like these
153