14.08.2013 Views

Human Rights at Home and Abroad: Past, Present, and Future

Human Rights at Home and Abroad: Past, Present, and Future

Human Rights at Home and Abroad: Past, Present, and Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kristin Kelly, Bloomsburg University<br />

Distortion <strong>and</strong> Exploit<strong>at</strong>ion: The Realities of the <strong>Human</strong> Terrain System Project<br />

Throughout history, anthropologists have been involved in military actions th<strong>at</strong> may have helped<br />

an area of people but have overall harmed them. In regards to the American Anthropological Associ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

(AAA) code of ethics, if an anthropologist involves themselves with any ―military actions or war efforts‖<br />

they will more than likely be viol<strong>at</strong>ing the code of ethics. After analysis of the code of ethics from the<br />

AAA, anthropologists should not be involved in any government military oper<strong>at</strong>ions, nor should their<br />

anthropological d<strong>at</strong>a be used for this purpose.<br />

During World War II anthropologists were called on by the government to help aid in studying<br />

Japanese Americans in the government project called War Reloc<strong>at</strong>ion Authority. This agency was<br />

responsible for placing Japanese Americans in reloc<strong>at</strong>ion camps where they were confined for some time.<br />

While anthropologist‘s intentions may have been to improve conditions, they also neg<strong>at</strong>ively affected the<br />

Japanese Americans in these reloc<strong>at</strong>ion camps. An article titled Engineering Internment: Anthropologists<br />

<strong>and</strong> the War Reloc<strong>at</strong>ion Authority by Orin Starn, st<strong>at</strong>es anthropologists were involved with ―Restrictions<br />

of discourse about removal, legitim<strong>at</strong>ion reloc<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>and</strong> promotion of racial stereotypes about the<br />

Japanese‖ (700). Anthropologists were hired to study Japanese Americans <strong>at</strong> the camps <strong>and</strong> did not<br />

receive informed consent from these supposed informants. This is a viol<strong>at</strong>ion of informed consent which<br />

st<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> ―Particip<strong>at</strong>ion must be voluntary. People must be told of the potential costs <strong>and</strong> benefits.‖<br />

Anthropologists involved in these camps were determining who should stay longer <strong>and</strong> remain under<br />

observ<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>and</strong> caused harm to these people forced to reside here.<br />

The Japanese <strong>at</strong> these camps were American citizens therefore their dignity was harmed because<br />

the United St<strong>at</strong>es government removed them from their homes <strong>and</strong> did not tre<strong>at</strong> them as citizens with<br />

rights. It should be unquestionable as to whether or not anthropologists should be involved in war efforts<br />

<strong>and</strong> military actions. The evidence shows how wrong this can be. Starn wrote, ―Ethnographers <strong>at</strong>tempted<br />

to predict the reactions of various groups in the community to contempl<strong>at</strong>ed actions of the administr<strong>at</strong>ion‖<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!