Human Rights at Home and Abroad: Past, Present, and Future
Human Rights at Home and Abroad: Past, Present, and Future
Human Rights at Home and Abroad: Past, Present, and Future
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
estim<strong>at</strong>ed 14,100 foster children are living with lesbian or gay parents. Gay <strong>and</strong> lesbian<br />
parents are raising three percent of foster children in the United St<strong>at</strong>es. (2010)<br />
These four findings prove th<strong>at</strong> the United St<strong>at</strong>es is improving in the ability of homosexuals to adopt <strong>and</strong><br />
foster the many children th<strong>at</strong> need a home. The government is allowing these willing individuals to give a<br />
child or children a warm <strong>and</strong> loving home. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, even with this progression there are still<br />
―three st<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> currently restrict GLB (Gay Lesbian <strong>and</strong> Bi) individuals or couples from adopting‖,<br />
according to Badgett <strong>and</strong> his fellow authors (2010). Because these three st<strong>at</strong>es are still discrimin<strong>at</strong>ing<br />
GLB individuals <strong>and</strong> couples from adopting probably means th<strong>at</strong> other st<strong>at</strong>es might be thinking the same<br />
thing <strong>and</strong> might even consider going back to their old ways of discrimin<strong>at</strong>ion. St<strong>at</strong>es compare themselves<br />
to one another in seeing how governments are being run <strong>and</strong> how it affects its citizens. St<strong>at</strong>es want to see<br />
both the good <strong>and</strong> bad aspects of the other governments to make changes to their own in order to make it<br />
better. This could mean st<strong>at</strong>es changing their own laws to make themselves a better place, so why<br />
wouldn‘t they think about changing laws/rights for homosexuals. Undoubting, with new rights being<br />
given to homosexuals th<strong>at</strong> were once denied, this had added more fuel to the fire so to speak. Gay rights<br />
become more controversial with every change made <strong>and</strong> don‘t seem to be stopping any time soon. In<br />
comparison, the United Kingdom has had problems with homosexuals being able to be parents.<br />
According to Helen Cosis Brown <strong>and</strong> Shelia Kershaw, ―the notion th<strong>at</strong> lesbians <strong>and</strong> gay men, because of<br />
their sexual preference, were unsuitable to parent‖ (2008, p. 123). Gays <strong>and</strong> lesbians had problems<br />
adopting children <strong>and</strong> being denied the ability to don<strong>at</strong>e eggs <strong>and</strong> sperm to fertility clinics. These issues<br />
have developed due to some citizens not believing th<strong>at</strong> homosexuals had the ability to parent. This was<br />
the main concern for those individuals. This idea was thought because only one sex was available to be a<br />
parent (either two moms or two dads) <strong>and</strong> not one of each sex to parent the child. In their minds this type<br />
of family was not capable of raising a child because children need both a mom <strong>and</strong> a dad <strong>and</strong> without one<br />
or the other a child would not grow up ‗normal‘. Homosexuals were denied th<strong>at</strong> ability to adopt <strong>and</strong> foster<br />
children because of their sexual orient<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>and</strong> not their abilities to parent. Brown <strong>and</strong> Kershaw of the<br />
U.K. report:<br />
65