Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...
Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...
Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Faculty of Advocates<br />
1.631 It would make for a more coherent legal system is duplication was avoided,<br />
leav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>choate offences, attempts and fraud to be dealt with by exist<strong>in</strong>g general<br />
rules. In Scots law these matters are largely regulated by common law and the<br />
law is, therefore less codified. For the most part, this should not cause any<br />
difficulties but there might be a potential problem at the marg<strong>in</strong>s because it<br />
cannot be assumed that the coverage by the Scots common law rules and that of<br />
the legislation <strong>in</strong> England and Wales is necessarily coextensive. As the Scottish<br />
<strong>Law</strong> Commission has recognised, many of the regulatory regimes relate to<br />
reserved matters. It is, <strong>in</strong> any event, <strong>in</strong>cumbent on Westm<strong>in</strong>ster Departments<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g policy <strong>in</strong> reserved matters to approach their task <strong>in</strong> a way which treats<br />
Scots law as an <strong>in</strong>tegral part of their task and not as an “add on”. Proposal 4 can<br />
be understood as hav<strong>in</strong>g reference to both legal systems but proposal should be<br />
amended so as to refer also to the law of fraud <strong>in</strong> Scotland as well.<br />
Central England Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards Authorities (CETSA) and West Midlands<br />
Region County Chief Environmental Health Officers Group<br />
1.632 In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple this is difficult to argue aga<strong>in</strong>st. We would be supportive of a<br />
consistent way of deal<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>in</strong>choate offences. However, when written directly<br />
<strong>in</strong>to specific statutes a simpler test is often applied. The mens rea elements of<br />
the <strong>in</strong>choate offences can be difficult with extensive case law to consider, for<br />
<strong>in</strong>stance on what amounts to “an act that is more than merely preparatory”.<br />
1.633 The advantage of hav<strong>in</strong>g attempts, <strong>in</strong> particular, <strong>in</strong> specific legislation is that it<br />
promotes “ownership” of the offences by a specific regulator, who is likely to be<br />
under a duty to enforce. Whilst we can see the issue with Parliament’s practice<br />
of writ<strong>in</strong>g offences <strong>in</strong>to new legislation that are already covered by the <strong>in</strong>choate<br />
offences, we believe they may have done so deliberately, <strong>in</strong> order to promote<br />
certa<strong>in</strong>ty where us<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>choate offences would not do so. If we are to cease<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g such offences <strong>in</strong> the primary legislation we would ideally like a review, and<br />
simplification, of the requirements necessary to establish <strong>in</strong>choate offences.<br />
1.634 Us<strong>in</strong>g other legislation also <strong>in</strong>troduces another layer of complexity. Costs<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease when legislative issues become complex. If there is less certa<strong>in</strong>ty,<br />
issues are less likely to go to court. Experience leads us to suggest that local<br />
lawyers are likely to be less supportive and more reluctant to prosecute under, for<br />
example, the 1981 <strong>Crim<strong>in</strong>al</strong> Attempts Act.<br />
1.635 There is a considerable amount of comment <strong>in</strong> the consultation paper about the<br />
CPR’s and the implication seems to be that these regulations only have crim<strong>in</strong>al<br />
offences <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to them as this was the easiest way of implement<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
directive. In fact the opposite is true, which the authors of the paper could have<br />
established had they asked either BIS or the Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards profession. The<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>al regulations conta<strong>in</strong>ed entirely civil remedies with no crim<strong>in</strong>al offences.<br />
The offences were <strong>in</strong>troduced after a long period of consultation between BIS,<br />
regulators and bus<strong>in</strong>esses. This consultation was afterwards held up by BIS as a<br />
model as to how future regulation of this type should ideally be conducted as it<br />
resulted <strong>in</strong> workable, proportionate regulation of bus<strong>in</strong>ess that <strong>in</strong>cluded crim<strong>in</strong>al<br />
offences.<br />
123