15.08.2013 Views

Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...

Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...

Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.311 The Hampton Report recommended the use of a process, developed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Netherlands, called the Table of Eleven, which identified eleven factors which<br />

enforcement regimes should take <strong>in</strong>to account. The "chance of sanctions" and<br />

"the severity of sanctions", are two of those factors and are identified as tools<br />

which <strong>in</strong>crease the likelihood of compliance.<br />

1.312 The Hampton Report recommended that "adm<strong>in</strong>istrative penalties should be<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced as an extra tool for all regulators…" (emphasis added). The SWA<br />

entirely agrees with that recommendation but notes that, by stat<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrative penalties should be made available as an "extra" tool, the Report<br />

anticipated that adm<strong>in</strong>istrative penalties would be used <strong>in</strong> conjunction with other<br />

pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g remedies, such as crim<strong>in</strong>al prosecution.<br />

1.313 The Hampton Report stated, with regard to "penalty regimes", that:-<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess and regulators have an <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> proper sanctions aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

illegal activity <strong>in</strong> order to prevent bus<strong>in</strong>esses operat<strong>in</strong>g outside the law<br />

from ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a competitive advantage. At present, regulatory penalties<br />

do not take the economic value of a breach <strong>in</strong>to consideration and it is<br />

quite often <strong>in</strong> a bus<strong>in</strong>ess' <strong>in</strong>terest to pay the f<strong>in</strong>e rather than comply.<br />

1.314 Of course, mak<strong>in</strong>g available a crim<strong>in</strong>al sanction does not mean that the<br />

enforcement authority has to take crim<strong>in</strong>al proceed<strong>in</strong>gs if, for example, the<br />

offender is a first time offender or the breach is not serious. The important th<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is that the enforcement authority has a range of sanctions available to meet the<br />

circumstances of the offence.<br />

1.315 The Government stated <strong>in</strong> relation to the Consumer Protection from Unfair<br />

Trad<strong>in</strong>g Regulations 2008:-<br />

The Government’s aim is to establish an enforcement regime that is<br />

capable of tackl<strong>in</strong>g rogue and unfair practices effectively while<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imis<strong>in</strong>g burdens on legitimate bus<strong>in</strong>esses. The Government<br />

agrees with the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of the Macrory Review that this can best be<br />

achieved by provid<strong>in</strong>g enforcers with a wide range of enforcement<br />

tools so that they can carry out an entire range of enforcement<br />

activities, from assist<strong>in</strong>g compliance to prosecut<strong>in</strong>g truly crim<strong>in</strong>al or<br />

rogue operators.<br />

"CONDIGN PUNISHMENT"<br />

1.316 The Hampton Report recommended "condign punishment" where regulations are<br />

breached.<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!