15.08.2013 Views

Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...

Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...

Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“regulatory authorities should make more use of cost-effective,<br />

efficient and fairer civil measures”<br />

“a set of common pr<strong>in</strong>ciples should be established to help agencies<br />

consider when and how to use the crim<strong>in</strong>al law” and<br />

“exist<strong>in</strong>g low-level crim<strong>in</strong>al offences should be repealed where civil<br />

penalties could be as effective.”<br />

1.212 The consultation paper argues that “the crim<strong>in</strong>al law can and should be used for<br />

the most serious cases of non-compliance with the law.” (Para. 1.5).<br />

1.213 I specifically agree with these but will comment on background issues relat<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

over crim<strong>in</strong>alisation and poor quality crim<strong>in</strong>al law; on the rational for the focus on<br />

the regulatory context (that is largely relat<strong>in</strong>g to bus<strong>in</strong>esses) and to a limited<br />

extent on specific proposals and consultation questions. The key <strong>in</strong>terest of this<br />

writer is how the crim<strong>in</strong>al law effects <strong>in</strong>dividuals, while also be<strong>in</strong>g concerned<br />

about effective action aga<strong>in</strong>st harm caused by companies. Therefore I will make<br />

some comment on the need for both consistency of pr<strong>in</strong>ciples as they apply to<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses (this paper) and <strong>in</strong>dividuals (largely outside the scope of this paper),<br />

and on the prospective benefits of the <strong>Law</strong> Commission carry<strong>in</strong>g over the<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciples set out <strong>in</strong> this paper to its projects on the liability of <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong><br />

crim<strong>in</strong>al law. The pr<strong>in</strong>ciples set out <strong>in</strong> this paper should be used to <strong>in</strong>form the<br />

Commission’s work to help improve both the general pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of crim<strong>in</strong>al law<br />

and specific categories of offence.<br />

1.214 The general pr<strong>in</strong>ciples the Commission sets out should be consistent where<br />

possible across crim<strong>in</strong>al law, <strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>in</strong> the relevant context.<br />

1.215 The suggested “statutory power for the courts to apply a ‘due diligence’ defence”<br />

would certa<strong>in</strong>ly ensure the law was ECHR compliant <strong>in</strong> particular cases, even<br />

though strict liability <strong>in</strong> general cannot be held to be <strong>in</strong> breach of the ECHR.<br />

1.216 Background: The Labour Government were obsessed with creat<strong>in</strong>g new crimes<br />

to appear tough on crime but that is often not an effective way to solve social<br />

problems or change behaviour.<br />

1.217 Lord Judge <strong>in</strong> the Supreme Court recently exclaimed “that for too many years<br />

now the adm<strong>in</strong>istration of crim<strong>in</strong>al justice had been engulfed by a relentless tidal<br />

wave of legislation. The tide was always <strong>in</strong> flow: it had never ebbed.” Reg<strong>in</strong>a<br />

(Noone) v Governor of Drake Hall Prison (2010) Times <strong>Law</strong> Reports, 2 July, SC.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!