Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...
Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...
Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Food Standards Agency<br />
1.709 Strongly agree. Reflect situation <strong>in</strong> food and feed law. Hierarchy of enforcement<br />
and prosecution is usually last resort. Small number of prosecutions <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />
number of notices and other sanctions is evidence of effective use of exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
hierarchy. Structure of exist<strong>in</strong>g hierarchy does not dictate where sanctions should<br />
start (ie first level does not have to be completed before the second).<br />
Association of Chief Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards Officers (ACTSO)<br />
1.710 Broadly welcome civil penalties to options available to Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards<br />
Services when decid<strong>in</strong>g most appropriate course of action to address<br />
<strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gements. But sanctions should only apply <strong>in</strong> addition to option of start<strong>in</strong>g<br />
crim<strong>in</strong>al proceed<strong>in</strong>gs. Rigidly apply<strong>in</strong>g hierarchy will create gaps that<br />
unscrupulous bus<strong>in</strong>esses will seek to exploit and prevent local authorities from<br />
exercis<strong>in</strong>g judgment about the most appropriate course of action consider<strong>in</strong>g all<br />
circumstances and relevant local issues.<br />
Leicester City Council<br />
1.711 Agree. Reflected <strong>in</strong> our enforcement policies.<br />
EEF: The Manufacturers’ Association<br />
1.712 A mix of civil and crim<strong>in</strong>al penalties should be used to create a hierarchy of<br />
seriousness. <strong>Crim<strong>in</strong>al</strong> sanctions and the stigma they bear should be reserved for<br />
more serious offences that could reasonably warrant imprisonment or an<br />
unlimited f<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
Care Quality Commission (CQC)<br />
1.713 Consistent with approach described <strong>in</strong> CQC’s enforcement policy.<br />
Faculty of Advocates<br />
1.714 Seems uncontroversial.<br />
Central England Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards Authorities (CETSA) and West Midlands<br />
Region County Chief Environmental Health Officers Group<br />
1.715 We do not disagree with this as a policy statement. The fact that our<br />
enforcement policies are written with a hierarchy of responses to breaches and<br />
our enforcement activities reflect this hierarchy pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is evidence of this.<br />
Follow<strong>in</strong>g the Regulators’ Compliance Code ensures this pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is complied<br />
with <strong>in</strong> all but the most exceptional circumstances, where it is necessary to go<br />
direct to crim<strong>in</strong>al sanction and, even then the Code for Crown Prosecutors would<br />
be applied. For these cases, crim<strong>in</strong>al sanctions should rema<strong>in</strong> as available. We<br />
reiterate that, at the moment, the civil sanctions <strong>in</strong> the RES Act are not available<br />
to local authority regulators.<br />
Food <strong>Law</strong> Group<br />
1.716 We found it difficult to understand what this would mean <strong>in</strong> practice but broadly<br />
agreed with the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple.<br />
136