15.08.2013 Views

Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...

Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...

Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Food Standards Agency<br />

1.709 Strongly agree. Reflect situation <strong>in</strong> food and feed law. Hierarchy of enforcement<br />

and prosecution is usually last resort. Small number of prosecutions <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

number of notices and other sanctions is evidence of effective use of exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

hierarchy. Structure of exist<strong>in</strong>g hierarchy does not dictate where sanctions should<br />

start (ie first level does not have to be completed before the second).<br />

Association of Chief Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards Officers (ACTSO)<br />

1.710 Broadly welcome civil penalties to options available to Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards<br />

Services when decid<strong>in</strong>g most appropriate course of action to address<br />

<strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gements. But sanctions should only apply <strong>in</strong> addition to option of start<strong>in</strong>g<br />

crim<strong>in</strong>al proceed<strong>in</strong>gs. Rigidly apply<strong>in</strong>g hierarchy will create gaps that<br />

unscrupulous bus<strong>in</strong>esses will seek to exploit and prevent local authorities from<br />

exercis<strong>in</strong>g judgment about the most appropriate course of action consider<strong>in</strong>g all<br />

circumstances and relevant local issues.<br />

Leicester City Council<br />

1.711 Agree. Reflected <strong>in</strong> our enforcement policies.<br />

EEF: The Manufacturers’ Association<br />

1.712 A mix of civil and crim<strong>in</strong>al penalties should be used to create a hierarchy of<br />

seriousness. <strong>Crim<strong>in</strong>al</strong> sanctions and the stigma they bear should be reserved for<br />

more serious offences that could reasonably warrant imprisonment or an<br />

unlimited f<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Care Quality Commission (CQC)<br />

1.713 Consistent with approach described <strong>in</strong> CQC’s enforcement policy.<br />

Faculty of Advocates<br />

1.714 Seems uncontroversial.<br />

Central England Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards Authorities (CETSA) and West Midlands<br />

Region County Chief Environmental Health Officers Group<br />

1.715 We do not disagree with this as a policy statement. The fact that our<br />

enforcement policies are written with a hierarchy of responses to breaches and<br />

our enforcement activities reflect this hierarchy pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is evidence of this.<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g the Regulators’ Compliance Code ensures this pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is complied<br />

with <strong>in</strong> all but the most exceptional circumstances, where it is necessary to go<br />

direct to crim<strong>in</strong>al sanction and, even then the Code for Crown Prosecutors would<br />

be applied. For these cases, crim<strong>in</strong>al sanctions should rema<strong>in</strong> as available. We<br />

reiterate that, at the moment, the civil sanctions <strong>in</strong> the RES Act are not available<br />

to local authority regulators.<br />

Food <strong>Law</strong> Group<br />

1.716 We found it difficult to understand what this would mean <strong>in</strong> practice but broadly<br />

agreed with the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple.<br />

136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!