Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...
Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...
Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Local Government Regulation (LGR)<br />
1.978 We believe that <strong>in</strong> relation to most legislation enforced by Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards<br />
Services that this is already the case that there already exists the clarity and<br />
consistency that is suggested by this proposal. This is largely due to the role that<br />
LG Regulation currently plays <strong>in</strong> the formulation and dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of advice to<br />
Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards Services as well as by means of the current statutory defence<br />
of all reasonable precautions and all due diligence to avoid the commission of the<br />
offence. We can also evidence noth<strong>in</strong>g to suggest that at present Local<br />
Authorities are act<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>consistently.<br />
1.979 However we consider that any additional measures that would aid such clarity<br />
and consistency as well better communication generally and specifically when<br />
draft<strong>in</strong>g legislation between central government departments and other agencies<br />
would be welcome and accord<strong>in</strong>gly we would agree with this proposal. We would<br />
also wish to ensure that the practical implications of the application of fault<br />
elements are fully understood when draft<strong>in</strong>g or amend<strong>in</strong>g legislation to ensure<br />
that regulatory outcomes can be achieved <strong>in</strong> practice.<br />
Association of Chief Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards Officers (ACTSO)<br />
1.980 Support <strong>in</strong>itiatives to ensure consistency and clarity but wish to ensure the<br />
practical implications of application of fault elements are fully understood when<br />
draft<strong>in</strong>g or amend<strong>in</strong>g legislation to ensure that regulatory outcomes can be<br />
achieved <strong>in</strong> practice.<br />
Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards South East Ltd<br />
1.981 TSSE has already <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> its answer to proposal 10 that the correct<br />
methodology for deal<strong>in</strong>g with ‘proportionate fault’ is by means of the current<br />
statutory defence of all reasonable precautions and all due diligence to avoid the<br />
commission of the offence. If the prosecution is of the op<strong>in</strong>ion that the defence is<br />
met, no prosecution will follow. TSSE does acknowledge, however, that clear<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es of communications between central government departments and other<br />
agencies are always desirable.<br />
The Magistrates’ Association<br />
1.982 Proposal doesn’t mention harm or potential harm and it should.<br />
Care Quality Commission (CQC)<br />
1.983 Greater clarity is needed <strong>in</strong> relation to proportionate fault elements but CQC sees<br />
a need <strong>in</strong> relation to the difficulty <strong>in</strong> hold<strong>in</strong>g complex organisations to account for<br />
even serious unnecessary harm to people.<br />
The Faculty of Advocates<br />
1.984 The adoption of a coherent, pr<strong>in</strong>cipled position about how offences ought to be<br />
structured is at least highly desirable – not least to make it easier for practitioners<br />
and judges to handle the offences appropriately and consistently – and that<br />
would <strong>in</strong>evitably require some centralisation. We emphasise the importance of<br />
deal<strong>in</strong>g with the Scots law dimension <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>tegrated way and suggest that the<br />
department of the Advocate General might appropriately share the task with the<br />
MoJ.<br />
187