Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...
Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...
Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts Responses - Law ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Association of Chief Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards Officers (ACTSO)<br />
1.1069 Need for certa<strong>in</strong>ty as to when defence applies to an offence. Certa<strong>in</strong>ly of benefit<br />
to regulator and those regulated. Should not be left for court to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
whether a general due diligence defence should apply <strong>in</strong> the circumstances –<br />
would be costly to regulators and regulated and lead to court time be<strong>in</strong>g wasted<br />
because of uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty. Correct and appropriate application for Code for Crown<br />
Prosecutors and local enforcement policies are likely to ensure prosecutors are<br />
not commenced for a breach of legislation without fault requirement if bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
concerned would be able to make out a due diligence defence. Is there evidence<br />
that current system doesn’t work? May not be the purest application of law, but<br />
cost of change needs to be balanced aga<strong>in</strong>st benefit which is not clear.<br />
1.1070 Re CP 6.39. Appropriate addition when offence is concerned with provision of<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> many cases provided to the regulated body by another person.<br />
Context specific defences often required and general provision will be difficult to<br />
draft which encompasses all circumstances appropriately.<br />
1.1071 Some offences (eg Reg 3 Consumer Protection from Unfair Trad<strong>in</strong>g Regs 2008)<br />
do not have a statutory defence s<strong>in</strong>ce fault requirement is addressed <strong>in</strong> offence.<br />
Care needed to ensure applicability of general defence provision is clear to<br />
regulators and courts.<br />
1.1072 Commonly bus<strong>in</strong>esses fail to respond to requests for <strong>in</strong>fo from regulatory<br />
agencies <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g breach of legislation. Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards powers <strong>in</strong>clude<br />
provisions requir<strong>in</strong>g disclosure and seizure of <strong>in</strong>formation required as evidence of<br />
an offence, but do not extend to <strong>in</strong>formation support<strong>in</strong>g any defences. Thus<br />
general proposal should be tempered by requirement on bus<strong>in</strong>esses to provide<br />
<strong>in</strong>fo on defences to regulators so that appropriate assessment of any defences<br />
can be made before proceed<strong>in</strong>gs are commenced.<br />
Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards Institute (TSI)<br />
1.1073 The Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards Institute feels that the current system, whereby a<br />
defendant has to show due diligence for some Trad<strong>in</strong>g Standards offences, is<br />
acceptable.<br />
Justices’ Clerks’ Society, The Magistrates’ Association, QEB Hollis<br />
Whiteman Chambers, David Wood, Food and Dr<strong>in</strong>k Federation<br />
1.1074 Agree / support.<br />
Local Better Regulation Office (LBRO)<br />
1.1075 Defence may cont<strong>in</strong>ue to work effectively if “all reasonable precautions” were to<br />
be reta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
203