15.08.2013 Views

The Economic Value of Water and Ecosystem Preservation

The Economic Value of Water and Ecosystem Preservation

The Economic Value of Water and Ecosystem Preservation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.4.2. Production Function Approach - Data<br />

Data was also gathered from the USGS for inflows at Tivoli on the<br />

Guadalupe River which is below the confluence <strong>of</strong> the San Antonio <strong>and</strong><br />

Guadalupe River, for the year 2000 - 2006. Rainfall data was also gathered as<br />

days <strong>of</strong> precipitation per month for the Aransas Wildlife Refuge. Finally, the main<br />

winter tourist season is from around December through February, while the<br />

greatest number <strong>of</strong> tourists is during the summer months (Morehead, Beyer et<br />

al., 2007). Tourist inflows are also influenced by bird migrations, in particular, the<br />

winter nesting <strong>of</strong> the whooping cranes which occurs from October to April.<br />

Dummy variables were constructed to account for tourist seasons <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Whooping Crane nesting period.<br />

4.4.3. Production Function Approach – Analysis <strong>and</strong> Results<br />

<strong>The</strong> production function model was constructed based on various factors<br />

discussed previously. <strong>The</strong> output was designated as the monthly number <strong>of</strong><br />

visitors to the Aransas Wildlife Refuge. <strong>The</strong> main input was average monthly<br />

inflows to San Antonio Bay as measured the Tivoli Station on the Guadalupe<br />

River. Other included factors attempted to account for correlation including<br />

nesting times for the whooping crane, rainfall, peak period for winter Texans, <strong>and</strong><br />

summer holidays.<br />

As discussed earlier, an analysis was conducted to look at correlation<br />

between inflow data <strong>and</strong> visitor numbers. <strong>The</strong> strongest correlations were found<br />

for same month inflows (positive), flows lagged by 6 months (negative) <strong>and</strong> flows<br />

lagged 18 months (negative). Figure 4-4 below illustrates the monthly average<br />

flows (2000-2006) as reported at the Tivoli gauging station compared to the<br />

average number <strong>of</strong> visitors to the AWR (2001-2007). <strong>The</strong> low flow period<br />

matches with the lower visitor numbers, which may be simply be a coincidence in<br />

the data caused by the 6 month intervals between low <strong>and</strong> high flows. <strong>The</strong>re are<br />

spikes in the visitor data for March from an up-tick in boat tours <strong>and</strong> also in<br />

October from bow hunters.<br />

An eco-tourism production function was specified as the monthly number <strong>of</strong><br />

visitors to the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge as a function <strong>of</strong> several variables.<br />

<strong>The</strong> independent variables included:<br />

• “Flow_Tiv” - <strong>The</strong> monthly average flow as measured at the Tivoli<br />

gauging station;<br />

• “AWR_Precip - <strong>The</strong> total monthly precipitation at the Aransas National<br />

Wildlife Refuge;<br />

• “Holiday”- Dummy variable for summer holiday period (June-August);<br />

• “Nesting” - Dummy variable for whooping Crane winter nesting<br />

(October-April); <strong>and</strong>,<br />

• “ Winter_TX” - Dummy variable for peak Winter Texans (December-<br />

February)<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!