15.08.2013 Views

The Economic Value of Water and Ecosystem Preservation

The Economic Value of Water and Ecosystem Preservation

The Economic Value of Water and Ecosystem Preservation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

industries. It can also predict how these affects will impact on consumers,<br />

government, foreign suppliers, <strong>and</strong> on the economy. Input-output analysis<br />

considers inter-industry relations in an economy, depicting how the output <strong>of</strong> one<br />

industry goes to another industry where it serves as an input, thereby making<br />

industries interdependent on another, both as customers <strong>of</strong> output <strong>and</strong> suppliers<br />

<strong>of</strong> inputs. An input-output model depicts this dynamic relationship. In addition to<br />

studying the structure <strong>of</strong> national economies, input-output analysis has been<br />

used to study regional economies within a nation <strong>and</strong> a state.<br />

Impacts can be divided into three categories: Direct, indirect, <strong>and</strong> induced.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> impacts in these three categories generates a total impact. <strong>The</strong> direct<br />

impact is the number <strong>of</strong> jobs gained or lost in a specific industry. Indirect impact<br />

is the impact that is generated from the ancillary industries that support the<br />

specific industry in question. For example, in Table 5-8 the fishing category under<br />

Indirect shows that 3.5 jobs were created in industries that support fishing such<br />

as boat repair <strong>and</strong> maintenance, fuel, etc. Induced impact is generated when<br />

individuals in direct <strong>and</strong> indirect categories spend their income in sectors not<br />

related to the primary. For example, the fisherman uses his income to take his<br />

family to dinner <strong>and</strong> the movies, buy groceries <strong>and</strong> clothing, etc, thus multiplying<br />

his income in the regional economy.<br />

For each industry there are three economic impacts presented: Output,<br />

employment, <strong>and</strong> income. Employment <strong>and</strong> income are self-explanatory. Output<br />

refers to the value <strong>of</strong> the goods <strong>and</strong> services produced in the industry. <strong>The</strong>se are<br />

typically the largest <strong>of</strong> the three values <strong>and</strong> for the sectors under analysis here,<br />

most output is exported from the counties.<br />

For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this report we will use the IMPLAN modeling s<strong>of</strong>tware for<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> input-output matrices for three regions: Aransas/Calhoun<br />

(combined), Aransas, <strong>and</strong> Calhoun. <strong>The</strong> input-output modeling allows us to<br />

develop economic multipliers for each <strong>of</strong> the four sectors <strong>of</strong> concern to determine<br />

the impact <strong>of</strong> the employment change identified in the shift-share analysis. Data<br />

for the model is based on the year 2003, which falls in the middle <strong>of</strong> study time<br />

period. While the decline or growth in employment will have occured over several<br />

years, the impacts calculated are based on the total change in the time period<br />

<strong>and</strong> the values generated are annualized.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se two techniques have been widely used by several studies, such as 1.<br />

“NAFTA <strong>and</strong> the Lower Rio Gr<strong>and</strong>e Valley <strong>of</strong> Texas: Measuring impacts”, 2. “<strong>The</strong><br />

economic base <strong>of</strong> Chaffee County, Colorado”, <strong>and</strong> 3. “Competitive Advantage<br />

Analysis: Results for the Northwest Region”.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first study aimed to measure the impact NAFTA had on the displacement<br />

<strong>of</strong> jobs (or not) from United States to Mexico, analyzing the economic trends <strong>of</strong><br />

the four counties that compose the Lower Rio Gr<strong>and</strong>e Valley – Willacy, Cameron,<br />

Starr, <strong>and</strong> Hidalgo. Opponents <strong>of</strong> NAFTA argued that this agreement would tend<br />

to displace jobs to Mexico <strong>and</strong> its proponents believed that the free trade<br />

agreement would lead to more jobs at higher wages rates. Texas was a target<br />

state for this analysis since it shares an extensive border with Mexico. This paper<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!