The Economic Value of Water and Ecosystem Preservation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Konrad, P. M. (1996) "Wildbird's Top 50 Birding Hotspots - The Best Birding Locations Await You Throughout North America." Wildbird, www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/wildbird/wildbird.htm Korosec, T. (2007). State Law will set flow standards for river systems. Houston Chronicle. Houston, Houston Chronicle Publishing Co. Vol. 106. Sunday, July 29, 2007. Lee, J. and D. Yoskowitz (2004). The Regional Impact of Winter Texans in Port Aransas, Port Aransas Chamber of Commerce and Tourist Bureau. Unpublished Document Longley, W. L. (1994). Freshwater Inflows to Texas Bays and Estuaries: Ecological Relationships and Methods for Determining Needs. Austin, Texas Water Development Board and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Lower Guadalupe Water Supply Project (2004) "Fact Sheet." www.srartx.org/site/Water_Resources/lgwspsept04.pdf Lower Guadalupe Water Supply Project (2005) "2006 South Central Texas Water Supply Plan: Vol. 2." www.twdb.state.tx.us/RWPG/2005_1PP/Region%20L/Volume%20II/Section%204C.07. pdf Mathis, M. (2004a). The Economic Value of Water for Ecosystem Preservation: Ecotourism in the Texas Rio Grnade Valley. The Woodlands, Houston Advanced Research Center. Contract 03-020. Mathis, M. (2004b). Some Economic Insights regarding the Role of Natural assets in the Production of Nature-Based Tourism: Discussion Paper. The Woodlands, Houston Advanced Research Center. VNT-04-02. Mckinney, L. (2003) "Why Bays Matter." Texas Parks and Wildlife: State of the Bays 2003, www.tpwmagazine.com/archive/2003/jul/ed_2 Morales, J. D. and J. I. Stallmann (2000). NAFTA and the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas: Measuring Impacts. College Station, Texas A&M University. Morehead, S., T. Beyer, et al. (2007). Community Charaterization of the Mission-Aransas National Estuarine Research Resere and Surrounding Areas. Port Aransas, University of Texas TR/07-001. National Research Council (2004). "Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision Makinged. Washington, DC, National Research Council. Nelson, J. T., R. D. Slack, et al. (1996). "Nutritional Value of Winter Foods for Whooping Cranes." Wilson Bulletin 108(4): 728-739. 80
Pearce, D. W. (1994). The MIT Dictionary of Modern Economics. D. W. Pearce and R. Shaw. Cambridge, The MIT Press. Port Aransas Chamber of Commerce. (2005). "A Celebration of Whooping Cranes and Other Birds." Retrieved July 25, 2005, from www.portaransas.org/cranes.asp. Ridgely, S. (2005). Personal Communication. Rockport, Rockport-Fulton Chamber of Commerce. San Antonio/Guadalupe Estuarine System. (2005). "Project Description." Retrieved July 30, 2006, from sages.tamu.edu/proj_desc.cfm. Sekercioglu, C. H. (2002). "Impacts of Birdwatching on Human and Avian Communities." Environmental Conservation 29(3): 282-289. Sims, K. (2005). Personal Communication. July 28, 2005 State of Texas (2005). Texas Water Code. Chapter 11, Sec. 11.027, 11.147. Austin. Stehn, T. (2001). "Relationship between inflows, crabs, salinities, and whooping cranes." Retrieved July 16, 2007, 2007, from www.learner.org/jnorth/tm/crane/Stehn_CrabDocument.html. Stehn, T. (2003). "Water Issues Affecting Whooping Cranes in Texas." The Braided River 18(1-4). Stehn, T. (2005a). "Current Whooping Crane Flock Status." Retrieved July 26, 2005, from www.whoopingcrane.com/wccaflockstatus.htm. Stehn, T. (2005b). "Whooping Crane Recovery Activities." Retrieved August 18, 2005, from www.whoopingcrane.com/wccatoday/htm. Stein, B. A. (2002). States of the Union: Ranking America's Biodiversity. Arlington, NatureServe. Stoll, J. and L. Johnson (1984). "Concepts of Value, Non-Market Valuation, and the Case of the Whooping Crane." Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 49: 382-393. Strayhorn, C. K. (2002). Window on Texas Government. Regional trends and Outlook: Coastal Bend Region, Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. Tanyeri-Abur, A., L. Jones, et al. (1998). Guadalupe Estuary: Economic Impacts of Recreational Activity and Commercial Fishing. College Station, Texas Water Development Board. 81
Page 1 and 2:
Final Report to the Texas Coastal M
Page 3 and 4:
5.2.2. Sources / Data .............
Page 5 and 6:
Executive Summary The San Antonio B
Page 7 and 8:
ecotourism included in the model. T
Page 9 and 10:
1. Overview of San Antonio Bay Regi
Page 11 and 12:
and shellfish species and estuarine
Page 13 and 14:
According to the Rockport-Fulton Ch
Page 15 and 16:
effect is limited by assimilative c
Page 17 and 18:
freshwater inflow acts as a mechani
Page 19 and 20:
sulfide. Heavy metals bounds to sed
Page 21 and 22:
inflow levels and populations of se
Page 23 and 24:
and could potentially make the cran
Page 25 and 26:
3. Characterization of Ecotourism i
Page 27 and 28:
Contributes actively to the conserv
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 3-1. Public Protected Areas
Page 31 and 32:
1987 and then purchased in 1991. Pr
Page 33 and 34:
3.3.2. The Economics of Multiple Na
Page 35 and 36:
Table 3-2. Average Willingness to P
Page 37 and 38: Table 3-3. Personal Income and Prod
Page 39 and 40: impact. It is necessary to conduct
Page 41 and 42: 4.2. Key Site Details for the Analy
Page 43 and 44: approach allows examination of ques
Page 45 and 46: This average number of trips from t
Page 47 and 48: occasional flood and drought events
Page 49 and 50: The results of the regression yield
Page 51 and 52: gallons, which results in a value o
Page 53 and 54: Aransas distinguishes itself from C
Page 55 and 56: thresholds vary according the size
Page 57 and 58: The total number of full-time and p
Page 59 and 60: The County also shows a lower educa
Page 61 and 62: Refugio shows a rapid decrease in t
Page 63 and 64: IM t+ n ic = E t ic ⎡⎛ E × ⎢
Page 65 and 66: included an economic analysis of th
Page 67 and 68: Table 5-5. Employment Shift-Share A
Page 69 and 70: Fishing and related activities. The
Page 71 and 72: Figure 5-15. Employment change by s
Page 73 and 74: 5.3.2. Input-Output Analysis The in
Page 75 and 76: Calhoun Calhoun County’s experien
Page 77 and 78: an advantage, particularly in oyste
Page 79 and 80: Impacts on the Freshwater Inflows t
Page 81 and 82: However, due to the lack of consist
Page 83 and 84: This implicitly assumes that flows
Page 85 and 86: for fresh product. This fishery wil
Page 87: Elliot, D. (2007). Competitive Adva
Page 91 and 92: The Nature Conservancy. (2002). "Na
show all

The Economic Value of Water and Ecosystem Preservation

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?