The Economic Value of Water and Ecosystem Preservation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

US Fish and Wildlife Service (2003b). Birding in the United States: A Demographic and Economic Analysis. Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associateed Recreation. 2001-1. Vincent, V. and W. Thompson (2002). "Assessing Community Support and Sustainability for Ecotourism and Development." Journal of Travel Research 41: 153- 160. Walsh, R. G., D. M. Johnson, et al. (1988). Review of Outdoor Recreation Economic Demand Studies with Nonmarket Benefit Estimates, 1968-1988. US Forest Service: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiement Station. Fort Collins. Womack Family Ranch. (2003). "Womack Family Ranch." Retrieved July 20, 2005, from www.womackranch.net. 84
Page 1 and 2:
Final Report to the Texas Coastal M
Page 3 and 4:
5.2.2. Sources / Data .............
Page 5 and 6:
Executive Summary The San Antonio B
Page 7 and 8:
ecotourism included in the model. T
Page 9 and 10:
1. Overview of San Antonio Bay Regi
Page 11 and 12:
and shellfish species and estuarine
Page 13 and 14:
According to the Rockport-Fulton Ch
Page 15 and 16:
effect is limited by assimilative c
Page 17 and 18:
freshwater inflow acts as a mechani
Page 19 and 20:
sulfide. Heavy metals bounds to sed
Page 21 and 22:
inflow levels and populations of se
Page 23 and 24:
and could potentially make the cran
Page 25 and 26:
3. Characterization of Ecotourism i
Page 27 and 28:
Contributes actively to the conserv
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 3-1. Public Protected Areas
Page 31 and 32:
1987 and then purchased in 1991. Pr
Page 33 and 34:
3.3.2. The Economics of Multiple Na
Page 35 and 36:
Table 3-2. Average Willingness to P
Page 37 and 38:
Table 3-3. Personal Income and Prod
Page 39 and 40:
impact. It is necessary to conduct
Page 41 and 42: 4.2. Key Site Details for the Analy
Page 43 and 44: approach allows examination of ques
Page 45 and 46: This average number of trips from t
Page 47 and 48: occasional flood and drought events
Page 49 and 50: The results of the regression yield
Page 51 and 52: gallons, which results in a value o
Page 53 and 54: Aransas distinguishes itself from C
Page 55 and 56: thresholds vary according the size
Page 57 and 58: The total number of full-time and p
Page 59 and 60: The County also shows a lower educa
Page 61 and 62: Refugio shows a rapid decrease in t
Page 63 and 64: IM t+ n ic = E t ic ⎡⎛ E × ⎢
Page 65 and 66: included an economic analysis of th
Page 67 and 68: Table 5-5. Employment Shift-Share A
Page 69 and 70: Fishing and related activities. The
Page 71 and 72: Figure 5-15. Employment change by s
Page 73 and 74: 5.3.2. Input-Output Analysis The in
Page 75 and 76: Calhoun Calhoun County’s experien
Page 77 and 78: an advantage, particularly in oyste
Page 79 and 80: Impacts on the Freshwater Inflows t
Page 81 and 82: However, due to the lack of consist
Page 83 and 84: This implicitly assumes that flows
Page 85 and 86: for fresh product. This fishery wil
Page 87 and 88: Elliot, D. (2007). Competitive Adva
Page 89 and 90: Pearce, D. W. (1994). The MIT Dicti
Page 91: The Nature Conservancy. (2002). "Na
show all

The Economic Value of Water and Ecosystem Preservation

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?