18.08.2013 Views

an innovative approach

an innovative approach

an innovative approach

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

teaching photosynthesis. Therefore, this research would like to integrate the<br />

technique into the development of a teaching intervention. The historical story of<br />

photosynthesis would be used to challenge students regarding the import<strong>an</strong>ce of the<br />

study of photosynthesis. This challenge might encourage their interest in studying<br />

<strong>an</strong>d fully underst<strong>an</strong>ding photosynthesis.<br />

The import<strong>an</strong>ce of underst<strong>an</strong>ding the nature of science was also recognized<br />

for student effective learning. In this study, the nature of science is integrated with<br />

the teaching intervention within real contexts of teaching <strong>an</strong>d learning.<br />

4. Integrating with the Nature of Science<br />

Student underst<strong>an</strong>dings of the nature of science; scientific knowledge,<br />

scientific inquiry, <strong>an</strong>d scientific enterprise c<strong>an</strong> not occur automatically without<br />

explicit teaching which provides a classroom environment or learning activities with<br />

current views of the nature of science (Bell, Lederm<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d Abd-El-Khalick, 1998;<br />

Smith <strong>an</strong>d Scharm<strong>an</strong>n, 1999; Bell et al., 2003). There are common recommendations<br />

among science educators who have suggested ways to promote the underst<strong>an</strong>ding of<br />

the nature of science. Smith <strong>an</strong>d Scharm<strong>an</strong>n (1999: 496) suggested that the<br />

underst<strong>an</strong>ding of the characteristics of scientific knowledge should be aimed at as the<br />

most import<strong>an</strong>t learning outcome for the teaching of science. Students should be able<br />

to judge <strong>an</strong>y argument about science by its characteristics. Bi<strong>an</strong>chini <strong>an</strong>d Colburn<br />

(2000) <strong>an</strong>d Bell et al. (2003: 488) argued that doing or experiencing science with<br />

professional scientists could possibly lead to better underst<strong>an</strong>ding of the nature of<br />

science. They believed that teaching should focus on student awareness of scientific<br />

inquiry which then brings students to better underst<strong>an</strong>d the scientific content <strong>an</strong>d the<br />

scientific enterprise. On the other h<strong>an</strong>d, Driver et al. (1996) <strong>an</strong>d Barker (1997)<br />

argued that emphasizing underst<strong>an</strong>dings the procedural development of scientific<br />

knowledge - how the knowledge was constructed <strong>an</strong>d had been developed or science<br />

as a social enterprise - would promote successful underst<strong>an</strong>ding of the nature of<br />

science <strong>an</strong>d therefore successful use of scientific knowledge in everyday life.<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!