Multi Industry Scenarios for Transport - Eurofer

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Goods delivered to consignee 6. Proof of delivery (returned Inland waterway bill of lading) 75 MIST Working Group, version 2001 If automatic identification is used for transport purposes, the goods are scanned to check against the despatch advice. This may be used to automate flows 6 and 7. a. Document issued to Carrier As a proof of delivery the consignee has to provide to the carrier a signed Inland waterway bill of lading. If EDI is used, this will be done by the message IFTSTA. b. Document issued to Consignor As a proof of delivery the carrier has to provide a copy of the signed Inland waterway bill of lading. If EDI is used, this will be done by the message IFTSTA. 7. Reception of the goods Once the consignee has the goods received, the consignee will check this goods with the goods announced in the despatch advice. The consignee will send to the consignor a document confirmed the reception of the received goods inline with the despatch advice. If EDI is used, this will be done by the message RECADV. 8. Freight invoice Freight invoice The carrier will invoice normally the consignor for the freight costs. If EDI is used, this will be done by the message INVOIC and if needed the handling and transport costs can be detailed in a message IFTFCC.
5. CASE STUDY ON INTER-MODAL TRANSPORT 5.1. Case Description - Material and Information Flow 76 MIST Working Group, version 2001 The case study focuses on goods delivery from Italy to Russia. Goods are loaded into Rail ship wagons in Milan, they are being transported via Switzerland, Germany and Finland to their final destination in St. Petersburg in Russia. 1. Place of despatch outside Milan, Italy - Milan, railway station, Italy Italian domestic waybill for road transport is prepared by the consignor in order to deliver goods from the place of despatch to the loading railway station in Milan. The responsible carrier is local haulier. 2. Milan, railway station, Italy - Travemünde, port of departure, Germany The consignor in Italy prepares CIM-waybill and the goods are being transported to Travemünde with this document. The responsible railways are Italian Railways, Swiss Railways and German Railways. In Travemünde maritime documentation (manifest, liner waybill) is prepared by Rail ship personnel and the wagons are loaded into Rail ship vessel. 3. Travemünde, port of departure, Germany - Turku, port of destination, Finland Wagons are discharged from the vessel in Turku where Finnish domestic rail waybill is prepared by Railship. Finnish Railways takes the responsibility over the wagons. 4. Turku, Finland - Kouvola, Finland Finnish Railways transports the wagons to Kouvola in eastern Finland where the goods are reloaded from Railship wagons to Russian wagons. This is the first time when the wagons are opened after the departure from Italy. Joint Finnish-Russian rail waybill (SNTL) is prepared by Finnish Railways. 5. Kouvola, Finland - Vainikkala/Buslovkskaya border crossing stations At these border-crossing stations all necessary customs and other authorities procedures take place because this is an EU/non-EU border crossing station. All documents are checked, Russian internal transit documents are prepared but no additional rail waybill is needed i.e. the goods are transported by using joint Finnish-Russian railway bill to the final destination. 6. Vainikkala/Buslovkskaya border crossing stations - St.Petersburg, railway end station, Russia Wagons are delivered to the final destination in St. Petersburg where the goods are being reloaded from the wagons to trucks for the final delivery to the buyer. 7. St.Petersburg, railway end station, Russia - place of delivery location outside St.Petersburg, Russia Local road carrier is needed to take the goods to the final place of delivery. The road carrier prepares local road waybill.
Page 1 and 2:
Report MIST (Multi Industry Scenari
Page 3 and 4:
Contents 2 MIST Working Group, vers
Page 5 and 6:
4 MIST Working Group, version 2001
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
2.1.4. Information flow description
Page 11 and 12:
7. Transport status report to the c
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
2.2.4. Information flow description
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
2.3.3. Information Flow Diagram CON
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
2.4.3. Information Flow Diagram CON
Page 25 and 26: 2.4.4. Information Flow Description
Page 27 and 28: 7. Stock inventory report 26 MIST W
Page 29 and 30: 2.5.3. Information Flow Diagram CON
Page 33 and 34: 7. Stock inventory report 32 MIST W
Page 35 and 36: 2.6.3 Information Flow Diagram CONS
Page 39 and 40: 2.7. Delivery from Consignor via a
Page 41 and 42: CONSIGNOR FREIGHT FORWARDER/ CARRIE
Page 43 and 44: Delivery to consignee 42 MIST Worki
Page 45 and 46: Contract for the sale of goods betw
Page 47 and 48: 3.1.4. Information flow description
Page 49 and 50: 48 MIST Working Group, version 2001
Page 53 and 54: 11. Freight Invoice Freight invoice
Page 57 and 58: CONSIGNOR (Seller) Freight invoice
Page 59 and 60: 4. Transport firm booking We distin
Page 61 and 62: 8. Transport status request 60 MIST
Page 65 and 66: 4.2.3. Information Flow Diagram 64
Page 71 and 72: 13. Advice of receipt of goods 70 M
Page 73 and 74: 4.3.3. Information Flow Diagram CON
Page 75: 74 MIST Working Group, version 2001
Page 79 and 80: 5.4. Proposed Solution 78 MIST Work
Page 83 and 84: Italian consignor Loadin g to the t
Page 85 and 86: 6.1.2. Information Flow Diagram 84
Page 87 and 88: PROVISIONAL BOOKING CONFIRMATION ME
Page 89 and 90: INSTRUCTION TO DESPATCH MESSAGE (IN
Page 91 and 92: TRANSPORT CONTRACT MESSAGE (IFTMCS
Page 95 and 96: JUST IN TIME DELIVERY MESSAGE (DELJ
Page 97 and 98: COMMERCIAL INVOICE MESSAGE (INVOIC)
Page 99 and 100: First variation 98 MIST Working Gro
Page 101 and 102: HIPPS project 100 MIST Working Grou
Page 103 and 104: NHM (71) 102 MIST Working Group, ve
Page 105: 104 MIST Working Group, version 200
show all

Multi Industry Scenarios for Transport - Eurofer

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?