29.08.2013 Views

849954 sisus

849954 sisus

849954 sisus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction<br />

The term common carrier has many connotations, depending on the context<br />

where it is applied. Mostly, it is a legal concept, e.g. under the Anglo-American<br />

jurisdiction where common law- doctrine gives a solid basis for legal matters. Often<br />

the term refers mainly to shipping companies; e.g. the 1984 Shipping Act<br />

(together with adjustments and amendments in the Ocean Shipping Reform Act<br />

of 1998) defines a common carrier simply as a ‘(…) person holding itself out to<br />

the general public to provide transportation (…) from the port (…) to the port<br />

(…)’ (Serko and Kane 2005). By interpreting the Act more accurately (and other<br />

inherent decisions and similar legislation), there are also some other characteristics<br />

for the common carrier, to name the common carrier’s right to accept goods<br />

from whomever offers. Also, a common carrier may advertise sailings and solicit<br />

freight, meaning that there is regularity of service between ports: there can be<br />

many shippers who procure the transportation service, though often serving<br />

more than one shipper per voyage creates a presumption of a common carrier.<br />

As regards documentation, the use of special contracts of carriage (rather than<br />

some widely-approved documents like Bills of Lading) does not preclude a<br />

common carriage (Stemshaug 1996, 111).<br />

The term common carrier can denote also to a specific organisational role having<br />

some special characteristics and respective indicators. Based on earlier<br />

studies (see particularly Nikkanen 2003b, Nikkanen 2004) it can be hypothesised<br />

that the status of the common carrier can be an interorganisational role for<br />

a specified focal firm in the transportation network context. Furthermore, this<br />

specific role can even be a reflection of the network identity. If an organisational<br />

role is defined in this way it is strongly in accordance with the expectations. On<br />

the basis of this specific role, the focal firm can express its involvement in the intermodal<br />

network.<br />

Generally speaking, a common carrier in the transportation industry ought to<br />

provide services, which are based on the idea of equal treatment of customers;<br />

in service production some degree of objectivity is thus required. In railtransportation<br />

systems railway companies often capture a common carrier’s tasks as<br />

they are obliged to do so: in many European countries there is still a government-erected<br />

monopoly for state-owned railway companies to perform solely the<br />

operations on domestic tracks.<br />

In transportation service industry, attention and interest has been paid to intermodal<br />

freight transportation (IFT) networks, which provide the context for the<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!