23.10.2012 Views

Electronic Parts/Guidelines - infoHouse

Electronic Parts/Guidelines - infoHouse

Electronic Parts/Guidelines - infoHouse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The cost differential between disposable and reusable containers is often smaller with large parts,<br />

than with small parts. With a high number of reuses, this makes the total materials cost very low.<br />

Large parts are often good candidates for warehouse on wheels (WOW) or kanban on wheels<br />

(KOW) inventory management programs. When parts suppliers are not close, just in time (JIT)<br />

dellvery programs are more easily justified with larger parts. The larger parts often are the more<br />

expensive and require the most amount of storage space. So, eliminating these parts from ware-<br />

house storage, usually results in significant inventory savings. Frequent delivery and no ware-<br />

house storage also reduces the number of reusable containers needed and results in low or free<br />

return Shipping costs, especially when the vendor's trucks are returning empty.<br />

lnventwy Control: Consider inventory management practices, when evaluating and designing reus-<br />

able containers.<br />

Be sure reusable containers hold the right number of parts to match inventory disbursement or<br />

manufacturing kanban quantities.<br />

Where inventory control is poor or when inventory levels (or part demands) are likely to vary signif-<br />

icantly, keep the reusable container or packaging cost very low, to minimize costs to replace lost<br />

items or to buy new ones. Also, keep the design of the reusable item very simple, so procurement<br />

lead-times will be very short. Durability and high reuse may have to be sacrificed, so replacement<br />

or new items will be inexpensive and easy to get.<br />

Bulk n. Unlt Packs: Bulk packaging applications are gWd candidates for reusable containers. Look<br />

for single unit packages that currently use several different materials in the package design. For<br />

example, ESD sensitive and fragile components and assemblies (e.@, small disk drives, cards and<br />

boards) shipped by suppliers and component plants are often individually packed with conductive bags,<br />

foam WShiOning, and fiberboard cartons. These individual and disposable packages can sometimes<br />

be replaced with bulk (holding many parts) containers made of conductive COrrUgated fiberboard with<br />

anti-static foam inserts.<br />

Other Pasign Facton: In addition to the design factors listed above, the following design consider-<br />

ations should be made:<br />

Design Style B Reuse: Select container and packaging styles that lend themselves to high reuse.<br />

For example, HSC 8 cap style containers are better suited to multiple openings and closings, than<br />

RSC style containers. They also can use closures other than tapes that may damage the con-<br />

tainer (e.g., tape removal may peel away liner board).<br />

Easy Use: Design reusable containers and packaging to allow easy packing, Unpacking and<br />

repacking. This will help to ensure parts are properly protected and packaging Items are not<br />

misused or misplaced. Avoid jig-saw puzzle complexity. If a reusable package is used only occa-<br />

sionally by individuals (e.9.. IBM Customer Engineers using field replacement part packages for<br />

park return) minimize complexity so the package can be easily reassembled and reused, without a<br />

high degree of packing expertise. Where possible, the packing process should be no more than<br />

three steps -open, place (the part), and closelseal.<br />

Cushioning Materials: Avoid foam cushions made with low density materials, especially foam-in-<br />

place urethanes and expanded polystyrenes. These materials will easily break apart and com-<br />

-press with high reuse. The shock protection ability will then be seriously degraded. CUShiOning<br />

materials selected should be able to provide adequate shock protection, after many drops and<br />

reuses. As a general guide, for each reuse, a reusable cushion should be able to pass the test<br />

requirements of IBM Corporate Specification, C-H 1-9711-005, Packaged Product Tests. For<br />

example, the test specification requires eight (8) drops - one on each package face, one edge and<br />

one corner. If ten reuses are planned for a cushion, the cushion should be tested with a total of<br />

eighty (80) drops from the required drop height.<br />

Component Replacement: Design reusable containers so worn or damaged components can be<br />

easily replaced, without having to throw away the entire container. Also keep component designs<br />

Material Redudion and Reusable Packaging <strong>Guidelines</strong> 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!