Identification of the major drivers of 'phenolic' taste in ... - GWRDC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

AWRI: Identification Of The Major Drivers Of ‘Phenolic’ Taste In White Wines 80 Figure 8-12 : Concentrations of broad phenolic classes of all 2010 wines by variety. Error bars represent ± 1 standard deviation mg/L GAE, ECE, FAE, Q3GE mg/L GAE, ECE, FAE, Q3GE 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Chardonnay Riesling Viognier WBP FR LP HP HOX-FR HOX-LHP MAC Figure 8-13: Concentrations of broad phenolic classes of all 2010 wines by treatment
AWRI: Identification Of The Major Drivers Of ‘Phenolic’ Taste In White Wines 81 mg/L (equiv) 20 16 12 8 4 0 Figure 8-14: Variation of detailed phenolic classes. All 2010 wines. Error bars represent ± 1 SD. EE = ethyl ester. 8.5.4 Effect of Winemaking on ‘Phenolic Tastes’ The mean attribute intensity ratings given to the 2010 wines are given in Figure 8-15. The order that the treatments are presented is based on the total phenolic content across the three varieties (Figure 8-10) which corresponds to the level of maceration and hyperoxidation. The astringency of the Riesling and Viognier wines generally decreased with the level of phenolics, while viscosity increased. There was no consistent change in the astringency or viscosity of the Chardonnay wines with phenolic level (Figure 8- 15). Astringency of the Riesling and Viognier wines were very strongly negatively correlated with pH (- 0.87 and -0.86 respectively) and the viscosity was strongly positively correlated with pH (0.6 and 0.89 respectively). The correlation between the astringency and viscosity of the Chardonnay wines with pH (- 0.16 and 0.44) were not significant probably as a result of a narrow pH range in the Chardonnay wines. However, across the three varieties the correlation between astringency and pH was -0.87 (p
Page 1 and 2:
Identification of the major drivers
Page 3 and 4:
AWRI: Identification Of The Major D
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30: AWRI: Identification Of The Major D
Page 79: AWRI: Identification Of The Major D
Page 113 and 114: RT (min) AWRI: Identification Of Th
Page 115 and 116: RT (min) AWRI: Identification Of Th
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139:
show all

Identification of the major drivers of 'phenolic' taste in ... - GWRDC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?