27.09.2013 Views

Identification of the major drivers of 'phenolic' taste in ... - GWRDC

Identification of the major drivers of 'phenolic' taste in ... - GWRDC

Identification of the major drivers of 'phenolic' taste in ... - GWRDC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AWRI: <strong>Identification</strong> Of The Major Drivers Of ‘Phenolic’ Taste In White W<strong>in</strong>es<br />

83<br />

Astr<strong>in</strong>gency<br />

Viscosity<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

r= -0.87<br />

1.0<br />

2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4<br />

pH<br />

Figure 8-16: Perceived astr<strong>in</strong>gency vs. pH – all 2010 w<strong>in</strong>es<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4<br />

pH<br />

r= 0.70<br />

Figure 8-17: Perceived viscosity vs. pH – all 2010 w<strong>in</strong>es<br />

It would be expected that under <strong>the</strong> salivary prote<strong>in</strong>-phenolic model <strong>of</strong> astr<strong>in</strong>gency, that <strong>the</strong> higher<br />

phenolic w<strong>in</strong>es should be more astr<strong>in</strong>gent ra<strong>the</strong>r than less, which was observed here. Acids are known to<br />

elicit astr<strong>in</strong>gency <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own right, with astr<strong>in</strong>gency be<strong>in</strong>g most strongly correlated with pH (Lawless et<br />

al. 1996). Therefore, it would appear that <strong>the</strong> variations <strong>in</strong> astr<strong>in</strong>gency <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Riesl<strong>in</strong>g and Viognier w<strong>in</strong>es

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!