Rules for qualification of NDT systems in Sweden (PDF ... - Vattenfall

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PBM2 Chapter 3 10(21) Edition: 4 KO shall pursue research and development (R&D) work in co-operation with the Licensee in technical fields relevant to inspection qualification. The purpose of the R&D should be to advance knowledge in these areas, develop new, or improve existing tools (e.g. mathematical modelling) and improve the reliability and quality of ongoing qualifications. As a consequence of the specialist competence that will be built up within KO, KO should, upon agreement, as a service to the other parties, make this competence available to them. This must, of course, be done taking into consideration the regulator’s requirements for impartiality and secrecy, as well as other parties’ commercial confidentiality requirements and good business practice. 3.3 The accredited laboratory (AL) The Accredited Laboratory (AL) carries out in-service inspection in theLicensee’s plant, with qualified inspection systems and shall: • Make the equipment, procedures and personnel available for qualification, which are intended to be used for inspection in the Licensee’s plant. • Provide data and technical support, at the request of the Licensee, to produce technical justification and other necessary qualification documentation. • Implement a quality assurance system, implement and document personnel training, etc. • Provide the qualification body with accreditation, personnel certification and other personnel training documentation, relevant to pending qualifications. • Comply to the procedures and other instructions of the qualification body, during qualification, The secrecy requirements are especially important.. • Notify the qualification body and the Licensee of any changes in equipment, inspection procedures, personnel or tasks, which may necessitate supplementary qualification. • Report any significant deviations compared to the qualification carried out, to the Licensee for assessment, found before commencing with or during inspection in his plant. It is permitted for an accredited laboratory to undergo qualification without having a commission from a Licensee. In such cases the accredited laboratory takes over relevant parts of the Licensee's tasks. For several reasons it is important that AL reports detected defects in an unambiguous and agreed upon manner. Otherwise both the qualification and the accreditation of AL could be questioned and the communication on site between Licensee and AK be jeopardised. Directions have therefore been written on “Uniform Reporting Requirements for In service Inspections”, see appendix 6, which are to be used both for qualification and on-site inspections. The most important points are: • Irregular defects shall for measuring be enclosed in rectangle parallel to the component surface. The defect size is the height and length of this rectangle.
PBM2 Chapter 3 11(21) Edition: 4 • If any of the measured dimensions (without tolerance) of the defect are smaller than the detection goal, this dimension shall be reported as “smaller than the detection target”. • Defect dimensions greater than the detection target shall always be reported as measured dimension and tolerans. • Deviations , whether in inspection purpose or in inspection scope, shall always be reported in a non-conformance report (NCR). • Defects found outside the qualified (planned) inspection volume (scope) shall be reported in a non-conformance report (NCR). 3.4 The accredited inspection agency (AK) The Accredited Inspection Agency (AK) has no active role in inspection qualification, but has tasks connected with the inspection carried out on site. The following tasks with connection to inspection qualification are performed by AK: • Review the Licensee’s defect descriptions and technical justifications regarding relevant defects that can occur in components to be inspected. • Review defect- and and structural integrity analyses prepared by Licensee. • Review inspection intervals specified by Licensee. • Assess ISI on site and certify conformity with the requirements in the regulations. This implies that AK shall certify that the inspection on site is in conformity with the qualification and has been carried out by an accredited laboratory. • Review and assess any deviations in the inspection carried out with regard to scope, e.g. physical limitations.
Page 1 and 2: PBM2 RULES FOR QUALIFICATION OF NDT
Page 3 and 4: PBM2 3(21) Appendix 1 Kvalificering
Page 5 and 6: PBM2 Chapter 1 5(21) 1 SCOPE Editio
Page 7 and 8: PBM2 Chapter 2 7(21) 2.2 Defect siz
Page 9: PBM2 Chapter 3 9(21) Edition: 4 •
Page 13 and 14: PBM2 Chapter 4 13(21) 4.5 Defect sp
Page 15 and 16: PBM2 Chapter 4 15(21) 4.13 Result r
Page 17 and 18: PBM2 Chapter 5 17(21) 5.4 Qualifica
Page 19 and 20: PBM2 Chapter 7 19(21) 7 TEST PIECES
Page 21 and 22: PBM2 Chapter 9 21(21) 9 REFERENCES
Page 23 and 24: Dokumenttyp Sekretessklass Status G
Page 25 and 26: ID-nummer / Utgåva Alternativt ID
Page 57 and 58: PBM2 Appendix 2 1(6) Förf Tel Utsk
Page 59 and 60: PBM2 Appendix 2 3(6) Barsebäck Kra
Page 61 and 62:
PBM2 Appendix 2 5(6) Barsebäck Kra
Page 63 and 64:
PBM2 Appendix 3 1(16) Edition 4 Fö
Page 65 and 66:
PBM2 Appendix 3 3(16) Edition 4 Rap
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
PBM2 Appendix 3 11(16) Edition 4 Ra
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
PBM2 Appendix 4 1(38) EUROPEAN COMM
Page 81 and 82:
PBM2 Appendix 4 3(38) 3.Overview of
Page 83 and 84:
PBM2 Appendix 4 5(38) 11. Input on
Page 85 and 86:
PBM2 Appendix 4 7(38) 2.1 Component
Page 87 and 88:
PBM2 Appendix 4 9(38) • Volume to
Page 89 and 90:
PBM2 Appendix 4 11(38) the specifie
Page 91 and 92:
PBM2 Appendix 4 13(38) 5. Physical
Page 93 and 94:
PBM2 Appendix 4 15(38) parameters a
Page 95 and 96:
PBM2 Appendix 4 17(38) There may in
Page 97 and 98:
PBM2 Appendix 4 19(38) theoretical
Page 99 and 100:
PBM2 Appendix 4 21(38) identified f
Page 101 and 102:
PBM2 Appendix 4 23(38) uncomfortabl
Page 103 and 104:
PBM2 Appendix 4 25(38) APPENDIX 2 L
Page 105 and 106:
PBM2 Appendix 4 27(38) - Flaw Macro
Page 107 and 108:
PBM2 Appendix 4 29(38) A definition
Page 109 and 110:
PBM2 Appendix 4 31(38) - Technical
Page 111 and 112:
PBM2 Appendix 4 33(38) APPENDIX 3 D
Page 113 and 114:
PBM2 Appendix 4 35(38) direction an
Page 115 and 116:
PBM2 Appendix 4 37(38) blocks using
Page 117 and 118:
PBM2 Appendix 5 1(38) EUROPEAN COMM
Page 119 and 120:
PBM2 Appendix 5 3(38) In the Europe
Page 121 and 122:
PBM2 Appendix 5 5(38) example throu
Page 123 and 124:
PBM2 Appendix 5 7(38) selected so t
Page 125 and 126:
PBM2 Appendix 5 9(38) Legend : Part
Page 127 and 128:
PBM2 Appendix 5 11(38) Edition 4 Ut
Page 129 and 130:
PBM2 Appendix 5 13(38) test pieces.
Page 131 and 132:
PBM2 Appendix 5 15(38) 4. Recommend
Page 133 and 134:
PBM2 Appendix 5 17(38) component(s)
Page 135 and 136:
PBM2 Appendix 5 19(38) cladding may
Page 137 and 138:
PBM2 Appendix 5 21(38) Edition 4 /1
Page 139 and 140:
PBM2 Appendix 5 DOCUMENT: PBM2 Appe
Page 141 and 142:
PBM2 Appendix 5 25(38) c. The exten
Page 143 and 144:
PBM2 Appendix 5 27(38) 6. Balance b
Page 145 and 146:
PBM2 Appendix 5 29(38) procedure an
Page 147 and 148:
PBM2 Appendix 5 31(38) (2) Because
Page 149 and 150:
PBM2 Appendix 5 33(38) • Evidence
Page 151 and 152:
PBM2 Appendix 5 35(38) Because of l
Page 153 and 154:
PBM2 Appendix 5 37(38) References t
Page 155 and 156:
PBM2 Appendix 6 1(4) Our ref Date Y
Page 157 and 158:
PBM2 Appendix 6 3(4) TC - Jan-Åke
Page 159 and 160:
PBM2 Appendix 7 1(11) Edition 4 APP
Page 161 and 162:
PBM2 Appendix 7 3(11) Edition 4 Ter
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169:
PBM2 Appendix 7 11(11) Edition 4 Te
show all

Rules for qualification of NDT systems in Sweden (PDF ... - Vattenfall

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?