6.0 Literaturverzeichnis Adelson, D.L. 2008. Insights and applications from sequencing the bovine genome. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 20:54-60. Anger, M., Kues, W.A., Klima, J., Mielenz, M., Motlik, J., Carnwath, J.W. and Niemann, H. 2003 Cloning and cell cycle-specific regulation of Polo-like kinase in porcine fetal fibroblasts. Molecular Reproduction and Development 65, 245-253. Avery, O.T., MacLeod, C.M., McCarty, M. 1944. Studies on the chemical nature of the substance inducing transformation of pneumococcal types. J. Exp. Med. 79, 137-158. Bach, F. H. 1998. Xenotransplantation: Problems and prospects. Annu. Rev. Med. 49, 301- 310. Bennett, S.T., Barnes C., Cox, A., Davies, L, Brown, C. 2005. Toward the 1,000 dollars human genome. Pharmacogenomics 6, 373-82. Bird, A. 1992. The essentials of DNA methylation. Cell. 70, 5-8. Brackett, B.G., Baranska, W., Sawicki, W., Koprowski, H. 1971.Uptake of heterologous genome by mammalian spermatozoa and its transfer to ova through fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 68, 353-7. Brem, G., Brenig, B., Goodman, H. M., Selden, R. C., Graf, F.,Kruff, B., Springmann, K., Hondele, J., Meyer, J., Winnacker, E.L. & Kr.ausslich, H. 1985. Production of transgenic mice, rabbits and pigs by microinjection into pronuclei. Zuchthygiene 20, 251—252. Brophy, B., Smolenski, G., Wheeler, T., Wells, D., L'Huillier, P., and Laible, G. 2003. Cloned transgenic cattle produce milk with higher levels of b-casein and k-casein. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 157–162. Caligari, F., Marzesco, A.M., Kittler, R. et al., 2004. Tissue-specific RNAi in postimplantation mouse embryos using directional electroporation and whole embryo culture. Differentiation 72, 92-102. Capecchi, M.R. 1989. The new mouse genetics: altering the genome by gene targeting. Trends Genetics 5, 70-76. Cibelli, J. B., Stice, S. L., Golueke, P. L., Kane, J. J., Jerry, J., Blackwell, C., Ponce de Leon, F. A., and Robl, J. M. 1998. Transgenic bovine chimeric offspring produced from somatic cell-derived stem like cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 16, 642-646. Chan, A. W., Homan, E. J., Ballou, L. U., Burns, J. C., and Bremel, R. D. 1998. Transgenic cattle produced by reverse-transcribed gene transfer in oocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14028-14033. Chandler, L.A., Jones, P.A. 1988. Hypomethylation of DNA in the regulation of gene expression. Dev Biol 5, 335-49. 40
Chang, H.Y., Chi, J.T., Dudoit, S., et al., 2002. Diversity, topographic differentiation and positional memory in human fibroblasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12877-11882. Chou, C.Y., Horng, L.S., Tsai, H.J., 2001. Uniform GFP-expression in transgenic medaka (Oryzias latipes) at the F0 generation. Transgenic Res 10, 303-315. Clements, J. E., Wall, R. J., Narayan, O., Hauer, D., Schoborg, R., Sheffer, D., Powell, A., Carruth, L. M., Zink, M. C., and Rexroad, C. E. 1994. Development of transgenic sheep that express the visna virus envelope gene. Virology 200, 370-380. Clop, A., Marcq, F., Takeda, H., Pirottin, D., Tordoir, X., Bibé, B. 2006. A mutation creating a potential illegitimate microRNA target site in the myostatin gene affects muscularity in sheep. Nature Genetics 38, 813-8. Connell-Crowley, L., Elledge, S.J., Harper, J.W. 1998. G1 cyclin-dependent kinases are sufficient to initiate DNA synthesis in quiescent human fibroblasts. Curr. Biol 8, 65-68. Cozzi, E., and White, D. J. G. 1995. The generation of transgenic pigs as potential organ donors for humans. Nat. Med. 1, 964–966. Cozzi, E., Tucker, A.W., Langford, G.A. et al., 1997. Characterization of pigs transgenic for human decay –accelerating factor. Transplantation 64,1383-1390. Cui, X.S., Li, X.Y., Jeong, Y.J., Jun, J.H. Kim, N.H. 2006. Gene expression of cox5a, 5b or 6b1 and their roles in preimplantation mouse embryos. Biol Reprod. 72, 601-610. Dai, Y., Vaught, T. D., Boone, J., Chen, S.H., Phelps, C. J., Ball, S., Monahan, J. A., Jobst, P.M., McCreath, K. J., Lamborn, A. E., Cowell-Lucero, J. L., Wells, K. D., Colman, A., Polejaeva, I. A., and Ayares, D. L. 2002. Targeted disruption of the alpha1,3galactosyltransferase gene in cloned pigs. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 251–255. Dallas, A. and Vlassow, A. 2006 RNAi: A novel antisense technology and its therapeutic potential. Med. Sci. Monit.12, RA67-74. Damak, S., Jay, N.P., Barrel, G.K., Bullock, D.W. 1996. Improved woll production in transgenic sheep expressing insulin-like growth factor 1. Biotechnology 14, 185-188. Denning, C., Burl, S., Ainslie, A., Bracken, J., Dinnyes, A., Fletcher, J., King, T., Ritchie, M., Ritchie, W. A., Rollo, M., de Sousa, P., Travers, A., Wilmut, I., and Clark, A. J. 2001. Deletion of the alpha(1,3)galactosyl transferase (GGTA1) gene and the prion protein (PrP) gene in sheep. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 559-562. Deppenmeier, S., Bock, O., Mengel, M., Niemann, H., Kues, W., Lemme, E., Wirth, D, Wonigeit, K., and Kreipe, H. 2006. Health status of transgenic pig lines expressing human complement regulator protein CD59. Xenotransplantation 13, 345-356. De Sousa, P.A., King, T., Harkness, L., Young, L.E., Walker, S.K., Wilmut, I. 2001. Evaluation of gestational deficiencies in cloned sheep fetuses and placentae. Biol Reprod. 65, 23-30 41
- Page 1 and 2: Aus dem Institut für Nutztiergenet
- Page 3 and 4: Inhaltsverzeichnis 1.0 Eigene Publi
- Page 5 and 6: Dieckhoff, B., Petersen, B., Kues,
- Page 7 and 8: Bereits 1971 wurden durch Inkubatio
- Page 9 and 10: sowie Reproduktion und Krankheitsre
- Page 11 and 12: eine verbesserte Allokation und die
- Page 13 and 14: 2.5 Transgene Tiere für landwirtsc
- Page 15 and 16: Über die homologe Rekombination in
- Page 17 and 18: integriert trugen; die Fremd-DNA wa
- Page 19 and 20: Abb.5. Konditionale Expressionskont
- Page 21 and 22: Belgier und Piedmonteser, sind durc
- Page 23 and 24: Abb. 7. Die DNA-Methyltransferase (
- Page 25 and 26: 4.0 Ergebnisse und Diskussion Im Er
- Page 27 and 28: eseeding of outgrowing cells Tissue
- Page 29 and 30: 4.2 Gene knock-down Versuche in tra
- Page 31 and 32: vermieden werden. Um zu bestimmen,
- Page 33 and 34: starke Expression von hCD59 in Pank
- Page 35 and 36: Zellpopulationen als auch in Einzel
- Page 37 and 38: ei doppelttransgenen Schweine wurde
- Page 39: 5.0 Zusammenfassung In der vorliege
- Page 43 and 44: Golding, M.C., Long, C.R., Carmell,
- Page 45 and 46: Kambadur, R., Sharma, M., Smith, T.
- Page 47 and 48: Maatouk, D.M., Kellam, L.D., Mann,
- Page 49 and 50: Orban, PC, Chui, D, Marth, JD 1992.
- Page 51 and 52: Schuelke, M., Wagner, K.R., Stolz,
- Page 53 and 54: Yarranton, GT. 1992. Inducible vect
- Page 55 and 56: 8.0 Darstellung des eigenen Anteils
- Page 57 and 58: Iqbal, K, Kues, W.A., Niemann, H. 2
- Page 59 and 60: 9. Abkürzungsverzeichnis ACTB ß-A
- Page 61 and 62: Abstract Animal Reproduction Scienc
- Page 63 and 64: H. Niemann, W.A. Kues / Animal Repr
- Page 65 and 66: H. Niemann, W.A. Kues / Animal Repr
- Page 67 and 68: H. Niemann, W.A. Kues / Animal Repr
- Page 69 and 70: H. Niemann, W.A. Kues / Animal Repr
- Page 71 and 72: H. Niemann, W.A. Kues / Animal Repr
- Page 73 and 74: H. Niemann, W.A. Kues / Animal Repr
- Page 75 and 76: H. Niemann, W.A. Kues / Animal Repr
- Page 77 and 78: H. Niemann, W.A. Kues / Animal Repr
- Page 79 and 80: H. Niemann, W.A. Kues / Animal Repr
- Page 81 and 82: H. Niemann, W.A. Kues / Animal Repr
- Page 83 and 84: H. Niemann, W.A. Kues / Animal Repr
- Page 85 and 86: H. Niemann, W.A. Kues / Animal Repr
- Page 87: H. Niemann, W.A. Kues / Animal Repr
- Page 90 and 91:
246 M. ANGER ET AL. cell cycle in p
- Page 92 and 93:
248 M. ANGER ET AL. Statistical Ana
- Page 94 and 95:
250 M. ANGER ET AL. Fig. 2. Express
- Page 96 and 97:
252 M. ANGER ET AL. Fig. 4. Compara
- Page 99 and 100:
Telomere length is reset during ear
- Page 101 and 102:
Fig. 2. Telomere length of cloned a
- Page 103:
9. Rudolph, K. L., Chang, S., Lee,
- Page 106 and 107:
Review TRENDS in Biotechnology Vol.
- Page 108 and 109:
Xenotransplantation of porcine orga
- Page 110 and 111:
as a novel therapy for liver diseas
- Page 112 and 113:
3 Rudolph, N.S. (1999) Biopharmaceu
- Page 116 and 117:
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 72, 1020-10
- Page 118 and 119:
1022 KUES ET AL. FIG. 1. Activation
- Page 120 and 121:
1024 KUES ET AL. FIG. 3. Induction
- Page 122 and 123:
1026 KUES ET AL. FIG. 4. Growth cha
- Page 124:
1028 KUES ET AL. 31. Engstrom U, En
- Page 136 and 137:
2 P.S. YADAV ET AL. in agriculture
- Page 138 and 139:
4 P.S. YADAV ET AL. Fig. 1. Oct4 bu
- Page 140 and 141:
6 P.S. YADAV ET AL. individual cell
- Page 142 and 143:
8 P.S. YADAV ET AL. TABLE 5. Mainte
- Page 155 and 156:
Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 20
- Page 157 and 158:
Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 24
- Page 159 and 160:
Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 24
- Page 161 and 162:
Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 24
- Page 163 and 164:
Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 24
- Page 165 and 166:
Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 24
- Page 167 and 168:
Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 24
- Page 169 and 170:
The FASEB Journal Express article f
- Page 171 and 172:
To detect CD59 and DAF, immunohisto
- Page 173 and 174:
TABLE 1. Expression patterns in ani
- Page 175 and 176:
Figure 5. Expression patterns of hD
- Page 177 and 178:
demonstrated in transgenic pigs and
- Page 179 and 180:
Xenotransplantation 2006: 13: 345-3
- Page 181 and 182:
Table 1. Age, sex and transgenic co
- Page 183 and 184:
For color development, slides were
- Page 185 and 186:
Table 3. Pattern of hCD59 protein e
- Page 187 and 188:
thelial cells of small and medium b
- Page 189 and 190:
CMV-derived promoter expression can
- Page 191 and 192:
Arch Virol (2006) DOI 10.1007/s0070
- Page 193 and 194:
Inhibition of PERV expression by RN
- Page 195 and 196:
Inhibition of PERV expression by RN
- Page 197 and 198:
Parent-of-origin dependent gene-spe
- Page 199 and 200:
Fig. 1. (A) Expression of GFP in F1
- Page 201 and 202:
An important finding of this study
- Page 203 and 204:
CLONING AND STEM CELLS Volume 9, Nu
- Page 205 and 206:
366 FIG. 2. Floating spheroids in s
- Page 207 and 208:
368 oids and used as donor cells. A
- Page 209 and 210:
370 FIG. 4. The three vital piglets
- Page 211 and 212:
372 transferase gene knockout pigs.
- Page 214 and 215:
CSIRO PUBLISHING Reproduction, Fert
- Page 216 and 217:
764 Reproduction, Fertility and Dev
- Page 218 and 219:
766 Reproduction, Fertility and Dev
- Page 220 and 221:
768 Reproduction, Fertility and Dev
- Page 222 and 223:
770 Reproduction, Fertility and Dev
- Page 224 and 225:
Abstract Author's personal copy App
- Page 226 and 227:
necessary to provide the large numb
- Page 228 and 229:
analysis and the information conten
- Page 230 and 231:
maternal to embryonic genomic activ
- Page 232 and 233:
were determined for individual mous
- Page 234 and 235:
References [1] Goodstadt L, Ponting
- Page 236 and 237:
inter- and intraplatform reproducib
- Page 238 and 239:
2 Perspectives in Agriculture, Vete
- Page 240 and 241:
4 Perspectives in Agriculture, Vete
- Page 242 and 243:
6 Perspectives in Agriculture, Vete
- Page 244 and 245:
8 Perspectives in Agriculture, Vete
- Page 246 and 247:
10 Perspectives in Agriculture, Vet
- Page 248 and 249:
12 Perspectives in Agriculture, Vet
- Page 250 and 251:
14 Perspectives in Agriculture, Vet
- Page 252 and 253:
16 Perspectives in Agriculture, Vet
- Page 254 and 255:
18 Perspectives in Agriculture, Vet
- Page 256 and 257:
integrated in the porcine genome [6
- Page 258 and 259:
smaller than 200 nucleotides accord
- Page 260 and 261:
normalization (total RNA amount or
- Page 262 and 263:
References 1. Cooper DK. Clinical x
- Page 264:
mammalian gene expression by small