PM History/2 - Legacy Tobacco Documents Library
PM History/2 - Legacy Tobacco Documents Library
PM History/2 - Legacy Tobacco Documents Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>PM</strong> history/16<br />
of cigmen to revamp, mkt share up From 4~ .1 to 8 .6%, can't keep up w/<br />
demand . . .BUTa such growth is expens ve to generate & cap . needed to sustain<br />
it, so fart25O million in mostl borrowed funds to more than<br />
double Miller capacity & build its own can-ma ing plants//finally sales<br />
reaping profit gain, up from $6 million in '74 to $29 million in '75//<br />
THE COMMON LINK BET . CIGS & BEERs both low-priced pleasurable products<br />
ma e£rom agricultural commo a.ties processed & packaged on high-speed<br />
machinery, advertised the same way & sold to many of the same customers<br />
thru similar distribution channels . . .ADV . IMAGEs before <strong>PM</strong>, main Miller<br />
emblem was jazz trumpeter Al Hirt, "absolutely the wrong image," says<br />
QeQy . who switched acct to McCann-Erickson which came up w/Zi~.,,,ra wq,r lt~<br />
'~_ a, .rd . ~p,~.,yt~}},~_r „a_, beer as ~ye reward -- NOT ORIGINAL BUT "MILLER fl'YY~^<br />
IS ON TARGET, hammered`hiome w/same consistency & intensity~ the<br />
Marlboro Man was used . . .then the 7 oz bottle thought to be a packaging<br />
innovation//TRYING SAME STRATEGY IN BEER AS IN CIGS= <strong>PM</strong> brings out sister<br />
brands Miller Malt Miller Ale & popular-priced Milwaukee Extra, but<br />
none of e three ma e na ionwide despite some regional success/but<br />
IS RM= LITE LID WINNER/bought name from failing<br />
Mea;sterbrau, s ent o s reformulatin & mkt-testing, INTRODUCED IN<br />
JAN ,~contains 2 ca,,1 oxa.e.s,.of xeg„~b,Q;~.r<br />
.um sales//due .,~& price slightly above prem3 to<br />
<strong>PM</strong>!s huge cash flow, Miller is more formidable contender than some other<br />
#4 might be, big expansion plans ahead . . .more stress could be placed<br />
on Miller as Marlboro's growth in sales slowed to 6,°U in •75, a worry<br />
in view o£ its . share o£ <strong>PM</strong>'s cig vo ume, so antage the low-tar<br />
leader after 6 yrs but Merit answering the challenge after its into<br />
previous Dec -- BUT : too early to say what long-term effects of low-tars<br />
might be= could reverse trend down for per-capita consumption &^THEY<br />
IGHT EVE SMOKERS TO GIVE UP CI "<br />
--<strong>PM</strong> WILL STAY IN NY, NYT 8-2 -7 see JFCIII file<br />
--PHILIP MORRISs THE HOT HAND IN CIGS . BW 12-6-76s Key stuff about<br />
how John Landry unveil~~.s Merit plan 1 mos ago to the <strong>PM</strong> products<br />
comm ., more than usual tension intent5.on to distribute nationally w/o<br />
us g + O million in adv-promo i.n PirsT -yr . . MARLBORO<br />
HAD NOW JUMPED INTO #1 SPOT NATIONALLY -- still, they could see that<br />
overall mkt was headed to lower T/N brands (vs . Marlboro as "full-flavored<br />
standard) needed strong contender in this field/Cullman waves it<br />
,ahead. one of best decisions in ~Jast 15 yrst hottest brand debut since<br />
Winston 20 yrs earlier----ori te, Sales o£ .ISion place it among<br />
top 20 & will be in making money in '77//yr by yr <strong>PM</strong> is be inni to<br />
I dominate alon w RJR : the two taking larger & larger s are of a static<br />
mkt low-tar is wave of the future . . .for 15 yrs~ industry "has fought<br />
antismkg forces at almost every turn .'. .BU IT QUIETLY HAS MnvED TO COM-<br />
PLY W/SOME OF THEIR SUGGESTIONS," push to low tars urged by experts in<br />
healt field like GIO GORI, NCI VIROLOGIST, see his quote & MUST USE :<br />
"Since public persists . . .THE ONLY COURSE OF ACTION THAT REMAINS IS TO<br />
DEVELOP LESS HAZARDOUS CIGS"#~*#~*~~~~perfect as pro-industry<br />
philosophy/he notes big drop in T/Ns over past 20 yrs . . .ADV OF LOW T/Nss<br />
rests heavily on text, Vantage says "Think" while Merit stresses the<br />
tastep neither do awin in li£est le ads . . .whereas £or the "full-flavor"<br />
brands, cos s ick to glamous ero-worship as <strong>PM</strong> discovers that nearly<br />
35% of its customers are in the 18-24 age bracket//<strong>PM</strong> responding to<br />
critics most of them at RJR, who sa "• e-bran co . up to<br />
2 .2 o m vs a . ., 3 at 16 .5 worldwide <strong>PM</strong> #2 to BAT . . .<br />
KEYS TO <strong>PM</strong> SUCCESSs it's NOT AN INNOVATOR h ioneered in no brand,<br />
i wais a nt for com etition to esta a a e orv k& then movea<br />
to capitalize on mistthees of others . . .now has 5 brands in top 20 by<br />
is strategy/S TEST MKTG prefers taste-te<br />
& can thus better shield results & p ans from compet3. ors ENCOURAGES<br />
~10<br />
ITS R&D TO OFFER IDEAS . . .RJR passed AT in '55///<strong>PM</strong> TARGETS '89 AS<br />
"OUTSIDE YR THAT WE'LL PASS REYNOLDS," sense that it was coming & only v<br />
a matter o im~e . .~JR chairman Hobbs sna s back have no inte ~<br />
of' vi.eldin lea in '83 or any other time, tL 3'"'#'tt' *"n"#"K"**'~USE the ~<br />
ba~tle for 1 is clearly on & other cos losing ground to the titans ., . p~<br />
until recently, TWO DISTTN Tr .Y DIFF . MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHIESs RJR had p~<br />
hu e 2 000 s e o ce & elied d-nose3-s esmans ' to move ~<br />
e goods . gave li.ttle ought to well-rounded m g program & left this<br />
mostly to its adv agency, WM ESTY CO ., for 30 yrs, they dreamt up "I'D<br />
WALK A MILE FOR A CAMEL" while the co . concentrated on manufacturing<br />
& pushing the brands into retail outlets/all of which worked so long<br />
as TV adv was available -- BUT : probs after that, NOTING HOW THE FAMOUS<br />
WINSTON JINGLE COULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED EFFECTIVELY TO PRINT & brand's<br />
leadership began to wane . . .Hobbs concedes too much left to agency, RJR<br />
http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/fmw44c00/pdf