26.12.2013 Views

Report - Oregon State Library: State Employee Information Center ...

Report - Oregon State Library: State Employee Information Center ...

Report - Oregon State Library: State Employee Information Center ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 7.4: Summary of FLAC Displacements<br />

POST EQ<br />

MAXIMUM FLAC DISPLACEMENTS (m)<br />

F.S. Morgan Hills Capitola El Centro Landers Taft Mexico<br />

1.22 0.02 1.00 0.69 0.92 0.30 0.80<br />

1.41 0.02 0.57 0.49 0.62 0.02 1.34<br />

1.48 1.14 1.40 1.63<br />

1.54 0.39 0.34 0.33<br />

1.60 (a) 0.57 0.66 0.75<br />

2.08 0.42 0.42 0.57<br />

2.21 (a) 0.22 0.13 0.20<br />

(a) configurations with a lowered groundwater elevation<br />

The resources required for advanced numerical modeling of liquefaction and soil structure<br />

interaction are not available for the majority of bridge seismic hazard evaluations. In light of the<br />

benefits of these techniques for bridge engineers, it is worthwhile to compare the seismicallyinduced<br />

deformations computed using FLAC with the post-earthquake FS calculated with a<br />

routine slope stability analysis. A well-defined relationship between the results of these two<br />

methods of analysis would facilitate simplified estimates of embankment deformation from the<br />

results of standard and widely-used limit equilibrium methods of slope stability analysis. The<br />

embankment deformations computed with FLAC are plotted with respect to the minimum “postearthquake”<br />

FS obtained from UTEXAS3 in Figure 7.7. This figure has been developed using<br />

the deformations computed at the toe of the slope, as they are the most relevant. Soil movements<br />

near the middle and lower portions of the slope will likely impact the foundations of bridge<br />

abutments, as well as pier walls and bents located near the embankment slope.<br />

To account for the intensity and duration of the ground motions used in the FLAC analyses a<br />

Ground Motion Intensity (GMI) parameter was developed by dividing the peak horizontal<br />

acceleration of the input motion by the appropriate MSF (Figure 3.4). The MSF values proposed<br />

by Arango (1996), which closely follow the most recent consensus (Youd and Idriss, 1998), were<br />

used in this investigation. The Ground Motion Intensity is given by the expression<br />

GMI = PGA/MSF (7-2)<br />

where:<br />

GMI = Ground Motion Intensity parameter<br />

PGA = Peak Ground Surface Acceleration<br />

MSF = Magnitude Scaling Factor for the earthquake of interest.<br />

The GMI parameter is useful for sites in <strong>Oregon</strong> where the seismic hazard reflects contributions<br />

from both large subduction earthquakes and moderate, near-surface crustal events. The GMI<br />

value provides a simplified “weighting” factor that demonstrates the effect of ground motion<br />

duration on permanent embankment deformations.<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!