26.12.2013 Views

Henry Baird Favill, AB, MD, LL.D., 1860-1916, a ... - University Library

Henry Baird Favill, AB, MD, LL.D., 1860-1916, a ... - University Library

Henry Baird Favill, AB, MD, LL.D., 1860-1916, a ... - University Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

630 HENRY BAIRD FA V I<strong>LL</strong><br />

difficulty, by any means. It is only the first step in the<br />

process. The question then arrises, which should have<br />

come first, if great political parties cannot reach the solution<br />

by giving up their special privilege and helping the mass of<br />

people along, why, what is there that can attain the result?<br />

Let me call your attention to the fact that all masses of<br />

people are made up of individuals, and in the last analysis<br />

the quality of things in any given civilization is related, not<br />

to the mass, average quality, but to the individual; and it<br />

brings us right down to the question of individual standards,<br />

individual measure, individual quality, on this very basis of<br />

selfishness and unselfishness.<br />

I think I should have great difficulty if I undertook to<br />

define to you what is selfishness and what is unselfishness.<br />

What is selfishness? Let us think about it for a minute.<br />

Going on blindly, seeking our own, doing the best for ourselves,<br />

ignoring ever^^body else,<br />

perhaps would be regarded<br />

as selfishness. Deliberately seeking to do the best for<br />

others, always ignoring ourselves, w^ould be unselfishness.<br />

So, it is only for practical purposes that we have got to consider<br />

selfishness and unselfishness as being opposites, which<br />

is not strictly true. But to-day we will talk as though that<br />

were so.<br />

We find many people defending themselves in conduct<br />

that we charge them with pursuing upon the basis of selfishness—<br />

we find them defending themselves upon the basis of<br />

fundamental unselfishness. They say, "It is best that we<br />

do so-and-so ; it accrues to our advantage, but on the whole<br />

it is for the good of all." That may be true, or it may not.<br />

The burden of proof is heavv^ on the individual.<br />

When we come to unselfishness, w^e also find it very hard<br />

to be certain. We do a given thing, we make a given effort<br />

to do something for somebody else. Stop and think of all<br />

the ramifications of that! Does it come back to ourselves,<br />

to our advantage or not ?<br />

In a large proportion of cases our<br />

unselfish act comes back to our advantage, and really takes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!