26.12.2013 Views

INVERSION OF SYNTHETIC APERTUR,E R,ADAR (SAR) - MSpace ...

INVERSION OF SYNTHETIC APERTUR,E R,ADAR (SAR) - MSpace ...

INVERSION OF SYNTHETIC APERTUR,E R,ADAR (SAR) - MSpace ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in Figure 6.19 tvhich is a clilect adclition *'ith ulit iveighting factols, details<br />

of rnany srnall geologic featules have disappea-.-ecl because of the rnany scattered<br />

bliglit spots. In Figure 6.20 where the weighting factols rver.e a:0.75<br />

ancl ó : 0.75, lalge surface geologic featules of tlie North Range (northrvest<br />

parts in the image) are letained, and both ly'l4ltr4l-tlencling lineartetts of<br />

airl¡olne <strong>SAR</strong> clata ald lViVl4/-trencling linearnents of ERS-1 <strong>SAR</strong> clata are<br />

relatively well visible. Geologic featules inside the Suclbur.y Basin structule<br />

are l¡lur.,-ecl rvhen cornpared with tlie oliginal airborne clata in Figule 6.5,<br />

Northeast trelcling linear features along the Nortli Range ale also haldly<br />

visible.<br />

Instead of additive process, trvo <strong>SAR</strong> data sets can be combìned thr.ough<br />

a subtraction. The following subtlactive operation usecl is:<br />

DN".- : DNt I o' (DNA -<br />

DNB) (6.15)<br />

where ¿ is a constant factor'. Two subtractive irnages were generatecl by<br />

using a factor ¿ : 0.5 (FiguLe 6.21) and ø : 0.4 (Figure 6.22) using two<br />

original airbolne and ERS-1 <strong>SAR</strong> data sets. In a similar rnanner to the<br />

additive irnages shown il Figule 6.20, geologic features in the North Range<br />

have retainecl chalactelistics of l¡oth airborne (lVl4llü-tr.endilg linearrelts)<br />

ancl ÐRS-1 (ÂWtr42-trencling lineaments) <strong>SAR</strong> data. Features inside the loiv<br />

lelief Sudbuly Basin area ale less clear thar in the original ailbor.ne <strong>SAR</strong><br />

image (Figule 6.5), but are better inagecÌ than the aclclitive images shown<br />

in Figure 6.19 ancl 6.20. Noi'theast tlending lineal featules along the Nor.th<br />

Range are not so clistinct as the original <strong>SAR</strong> data in Figules 6.5 and 6.6.<br />

153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!