07.01.2014 Views

CHEM01200604009 Sreejith Kaniyankandy - Homi Bhabha ...

CHEM01200604009 Sreejith Kaniyankandy - Homi Bhabha ...

CHEM01200604009 Sreejith Kaniyankandy - Homi Bhabha ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

103<br />

study. Based on the injection dynamics study we have arrived at the model for the injection<br />

into the semiconductor considering the discreteness in the CB. For the sake of comparison<br />

we compared the present results with that of bulk TiO 2 /alizarin, this revealed a<br />

monoexponential pulse width limited injection. Furthermore, the BET dynamics revealed that<br />

it is considerably slower on the B-TiO 2 compared to that of bulk TiO 2 system. This was<br />

explained within the framework of Marcus inversion, where an increase free energy due to<br />

upward shift of the conduction band levels and also its discrete nature which in turn slow<br />

down the carrier relaxation time and eventually increase the lifetime of the electron at higher<br />

energy level, and finally led to an decrease in the BET. These observations are significant as<br />

previously it was believed that in a strong coupling dye the ET takes place via adiabatic<br />

route, but the present set of results seem to indicate that ET event is nonadiabatic based on<br />

the multiexponential injection. Based on this observation we can also predict that in a<br />

relatively weaker binding dye the injection time will be still slower and the BET rate will be<br />

more slow, which has tremendous implication for the solar cell application because the<br />

organic dye have gone out of favor among the scientists working on the solar cell because<br />

they have a very fast BET rate as compared to Ru-polypyridyl complexes. This study proves<br />

that this problem can be solved using ultrasmall TiO 2 . Alternately one can design solar cells<br />

with ultrasmall TiO 2 and Ru based sensitizer to further improve the efficiency from the<br />

present best efficiency of 10%.<br />

3.5. References<br />

1. O’Regan, B.; Graetzel, M. Nature 1991, 353, 737.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!