07.01.2014 Views

CHEM01200604009 Sreejith Kaniyankandy - Homi Bhabha ...

CHEM01200604009 Sreejith Kaniyankandy - Homi Bhabha ...

CHEM01200604009 Sreejith Kaniyankandy - Homi Bhabha ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

139<br />

1000<br />

c<br />

b<br />

PL Intensity<br />

100<br />

10<br />

a<br />

CdSe Core<br />

CdSe/ZnTe1<br />

CdSe/ZnTe3<br />

1<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Time Delay (ns)<br />

Figure 5.5: Time resolved emission decay traces of a) CdSe, b) CdSe/ZnTe1, and c) CdSe/ZnTe3.<br />

As we have mentioned in earlier section that shell formation is not complete similarly<br />

from time resolved emission data we can see that the emission kinetics still dominated by<br />

CdSe core emission. However we can still see that contributions of shorter components<br />

decrease and longer component increases for CdSe/ZnTe1 core-shell as compared to CdSe<br />

core. Finally we have shown the emission kinetics decay trace for thicker shell CdSe/ZnTe3<br />

in Figure 5.3c, which can be fitted bi-exponentially τ 2= 2.19 ns (41%), τ 3= 18 ns (59%) with<br />

average time (τ av) of 11.5 ns as given in the Table 5.1. Interestingly we can observe that the<br />

fast component (τ 1) is missing in the kinetic decay trace in CdSe/ZnTe3 sample.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!