07.01.2014 Views

CHEM01200604009 Sreejith Kaniyankandy - Homi Bhabha ...

CHEM01200604009 Sreejith Kaniyankandy - Homi Bhabha ...

CHEM01200604009 Sreejith Kaniyankandy - Homi Bhabha ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174<br />

A (m O.D.)<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

-30<br />

a<br />

b CdTe<br />

G-CdTe<br />

0 50 100 150 200<br />

Delay Time (ps)<br />

Figure 6.9: Bleach recovery kinetics at 460 nm for a) CdTe and b) G-CdTe after 400 nm laser excitation.<br />

The bleach dynamics measured at 460nm is plotted in figure 6.9. The bleach recovery<br />

kinetics reveals significantly different dynamics for the two samples. As previously noted in<br />

the literature the relaxation of bleach is governed by both radiative and nonradiative<br />

contribution [6.33]. The radiative contributions mostly arise from exciton recombination in<br />

thiol capped CdTe with lifetimes in the range of ns. However nonradiative relaxation arising<br />

from trap state related contributions governs the faster time scale relaxations. Previous<br />

studies by our group [6.34] on CdTe clearly differentiated the contribution of electron and<br />

hole traps on relaxation dynamics. Since the bleach contains significant contribution from<br />

electrons it is safe to assume that the relaxation dynamics is governed by electron trapping as<br />

previously pointed out by Klimov et al [6.33, 6.35] on CdSe. The different time constants

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!