09.01.2014 Views

Pictures Paths Particles Processes

Pictures Paths Particles Processes

Pictures Paths Particles Processes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5<br />

Dirac particles<br />

5.1 Pimp my propagator<br />

5.1.1 Extension of the propagator and external lines<br />

So far we have been studying particles that can carry only a limited amount of<br />

information : such a particle is completely specified once we have determined<br />

its identity and its momentum. In this chapter we shall start increasing the<br />

number of properties that particles can carry, by examining how the Feynman<br />

propagator can be modified. Since the pole structure of the propagator is closely<br />

connected with the causality of the theory, and must be used to derive Newton’s<br />

first law in the approximation of propagation over macroscopic distances, we will<br />

not mess around with the denominator of the propagator. The generalizations<br />

we shall propose therefore concern themselves with the numerator, and are of<br />

the form<br />

1<br />

T (p)<br />

i¯h<br />

p 2 − m 2 → i¯h<br />

+ iɛ p 2 − m 2 + iɛ , (5.1)<br />

where T (p) is some object that informs us that the particle propagating is not<br />

as simple as we have seen so far, but has additional properties. What those<br />

properties are depends, of course, on the choice of T (p).<br />

Now, one very important observation is in order here. The particle propagator<br />

never occurs in isolation, but always between two vertices, where the<br />

particle is ‘produced’ and where it is ‘absorbed’ 1 . This implies that, as long as<br />

we have not committed ourselves to particular vertices, a change in the propagator<br />

may be compensated to some extent by a change in the vertices. For<br />

instance, suppose that T (p) is a simple number: then the predictions of the<br />

theory will remain unchanged if we opt to multiply the vertices by T (p) −1/2 .<br />

1 It may be realized that this statement holds true also in the case of external lines, if it is<br />

kept in mind that these are defined in the square of the matrix element.<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!