09.01.2014 Views

Pictures Paths Particles Processes

Pictures Paths Particles Processes

Pictures Paths Particles Processes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

November 7, 2013 241<br />

certainly cannot be a fermion ; if it were a vector particle, its propagator would<br />

contain unwanted higher powers of the energy E, the W W H and ZZH would<br />

presumably be of Yang-Mills type hence also E-dependent. The vertices given<br />

above are essentially the only ones possible for the interactions between two<br />

vectors and a scalar if we want them to be energy-independent. Note that g WWH<br />

and g ZZH may both be expected to contain a mass, that is, they are of dimension<br />

L −1 / √¯h. The assumption that there is just one type of neutral scalar involved<br />

is, of course, based on nothing but a prejudice in favour of simplicity. Finally,<br />

at high energy all contributions from m H end up in safe terms, and we do not<br />

expect to glean any information on the Higgs mass from our considerations.<br />

W W → W W scattering<br />

Another four-boson scattering process of interest is<br />

W + (p 1 , ɛ 1 )W + (p 2 , ɛ 2 ) → W + (p 3 , ɛ 3 )W + (p 4 , ɛ 4 )<br />

for which we have five purely vector-boson diagrams :<br />

1<br />

2<br />

γ,Ζ<br />

4<br />

3<br />

1<br />

γ,Ζ<br />

4 1<br />

2 3<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

whose contributions can be conviently written as<br />

M 1 = −i¯h Y (p 3 , ɛ 3 ; −p 1 , ɛ 1 ; p 1 − p 3 , µ)<br />

(<br />

2 −g µν<br />

× Q W<br />

(p 1 − p 3 ) 2 + g 2 −gµν + (p 1 − p 3 ) µ (p 1 − p 3 ) ν )<br />

2<br />

/m W<br />

WWZ<br />

(p 1 − p 3 ) 2 − m<br />

2 Z<br />

× Y (p 4 , ɛ 4 ; −p 2 , ɛ 2 ; p 2 − p 4 , ν) ,<br />

M 2 = M 1 ⌋ p3,ɛ 3 ↔ p 4,ɛ 4<br />

,<br />

M 3 = i¯h Q 2<br />

W<br />

s<br />

2 X(ɛ 3, ɛ 4 , ɛ 1 , ɛ 2 ) . (9.87)<br />

W<br />

By the same methods as used in the previous section we arrive at<br />

⎥ ⎥⎥⎦ 3∑<br />

M j<br />

L<br />

j=1<br />

= i¯h E2 Q W<br />

2<br />

m W4 s W<br />

2<br />

(<br />

−4mW 2 + 3m Z 2 c W<br />

2 ) + · · · (9.88)<br />

The Higgs hypothesis now provides for two additional diagrams :<br />

1<br />

2<br />

H<br />

4<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

H<br />

3<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!