09.01.2014 Views

Pictures Paths Particles Processes

Pictures Paths Particles Processes

Pictures Paths Particles Processes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

254 November 7, 2013<br />

constant λ 4 to be small, but positive. If, on the other hand, it was small but<br />

negative, perturbation theory would look very different ; in fact it would look<br />

like nothing at all since for negative λ 4 the path integral is completely undefined.<br />

Therefore, the perturbative expansion is not regular around λ 4 = 0, and in the<br />

set of all ϕ 4 theories the point λ 4 = 0 constitutes an essential singularity.<br />

All may not be lost, however. The method of Borel summation sometimes 2<br />

enables us to assign a value to a sum with vanishing radius of convergence.<br />

Suppose that a function of a positive variable x is given by the sum<br />

f(x) = ∑ k≥0<br />

c k x k , (10.3)<br />

where the coefficients c k grow superexponentially. Clearly it is difficult to make<br />

sense of such a sum ; but it may be possible to make sense of a related sum :<br />

g(x) = ∑ k≥0<br />

c k<br />

k! xk , (10.4)<br />

simply because the coefficients do not grow as rapidly. Let us suppose that this<br />

is indeed the case. We then may employ the formula<br />

∫ ∞<br />

to arrive at the rule<br />

0<br />

dy exp(−y) (xy) n = n! x n , n = 0, 1, 2, . . . (10.5)<br />

f(x) =<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

dy e −y g(xy) . (10.6)<br />

Notice that here, we have again interchanged summation and integration, thus<br />

in a sense repairing the damage done when we arrived at the perturbation<br />

expansion in the first place. This approach is called Borel summation. We can<br />

illustrate this in a simple example. Let us take c k = 1, that is<br />

we immediately find that<br />

f(x) = ∑ k≥0<br />

x k = 1<br />

1 − x : (10.7)<br />

g(x) = ∑ k≥0<br />

x k<br />

k! = ex , (10.8)<br />

and indeed<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

dy e −y e xy = 1<br />

1 − x . (10.9)<br />

2 In zero dimensions this will work. In four-dimensional Minkowski space things are not<br />

nearly as simple. . .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!