01.02.2014 Views

Incest 0000i-xiv FM 1 - William L. White

Incest 0000i-xiv FM 1 - William L. White

Incest 0000i-xiv FM 1 - William L. White

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sexual Closure 125<br />

Again we see the consequence of an organization having no effective<br />

restraining agent to prevent the incestuous relationship.<br />

Key Board Member–Client Relationship. The sexual relationship in our<br />

next example grew out of the chance meeting of a counseling agency<br />

board member and a client at the agency. Knowledge of the relationship<br />

among the staff produced feelings of anger and lowered morale, as it<br />

seemed the mission of the agency had been tainted. As the counselor<br />

who was seeing the client began pointing out the destructiveness of the<br />

relationship to the client, word began to filter down to the agency staff<br />

that the board member involved was suggesting that a staff cut might be<br />

necessary due to recent financial setbacks, and that he felt the counselor<br />

treating the client he was seeing was the one who should be cut. When<br />

the counselor’s supervisor became aware of the complexities, she directed<br />

the counselor to transfer the case to another agency, and she took<br />

the information to the director and recommended that the board member<br />

be confronted. The confrontation did not occur, and the supervisor<br />

chose to leave the organization shortly after the episode.<br />

Staff morale suffered severely because of the ethical issues they felt<br />

were violated, the organization’s failure to confront openly what had<br />

happened, and the loss of a very competent supervisor.<br />

Analysis. The relationship occurred in an organizational family that<br />

had been closed socially for roughly a year and a half and was already<br />

seeing the development of sexual relationships among some members<br />

and extended family members (board members, spouses). Although<br />

many staff members were morally outraged at the behavior of the board<br />

member and the administrator’s failure to confront the issue, none saw<br />

that the board member’s behavior was merely an extension of a process<br />

nearly all of the staff members had participated in for some time.<br />

The treatment of the counselor by the board member is reminiscent<br />

of Weinberg’s observation that sons who challenge the sexual supremacy<br />

of their fathers (in incestuous families) are treated harshly and<br />

may be extruded. Staff members who confront the incestuous behavior<br />

of administrative or supervisory staff members in closed organizational<br />

families are often treated similarly.<br />

High Priest–Client Relationship. Many of the people interviewed as part<br />

of the research for this book remarked that the severest organizational

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!